This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Radio communication system redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Why is this "nonsense"? J. D. Redding 15:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
There are sources ... and I will improve it ... There are not plenty of other articles on radio communication systems. Show me if there is ... there is not look around. J. D. Redding 15:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
There are plenty of good accessible book sources that could be used to write an intelligible article, instead of relying on old patents for obsolete and stilted terminology that makes the article unintepretable. I removed Hays already, as the statement attributed to his patent was so ambiguous as to be meaningless. Now we've got a pile of John Stone Stone sources for stuff that shouldn't be there. Reddi, if you want to write an article that respects the historical development, the way to do that is to cite good historical sources, not to dig up obscure stuff out of patents. Dicklyon ( talk) 20:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps this should be speedy merged into the appropriate radio article? It's certainly misnamed, but if it's a redirect, that wouldn't be so bad. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
I moved this list of uncited general info to here instead of leaving the impression that they were used in writing the articles. Any that have actually been used should be actually cited instead:
These should be put back in .. will have to work them in individually apparently ... J. D. Redding 22:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
This article was created by one user to express his personal opinion. I suggest that it is deleted. Martin Hogbin ( talk) 22:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Radio communication system redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Why is this "nonsense"? J. D. Redding 15:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
There are sources ... and I will improve it ... There are not plenty of other articles on radio communication systems. Show me if there is ... there is not look around. J. D. Redding 15:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
There are plenty of good accessible book sources that could be used to write an intelligible article, instead of relying on old patents for obsolete and stilted terminology that makes the article unintepretable. I removed Hays already, as the statement attributed to his patent was so ambiguous as to be meaningless. Now we've got a pile of John Stone Stone sources for stuff that shouldn't be there. Reddi, if you want to write an article that respects the historical development, the way to do that is to cite good historical sources, not to dig up obscure stuff out of patents. Dicklyon ( talk) 20:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps this should be speedy merged into the appropriate radio article? It's certainly misnamed, but if it's a redirect, that wouldn't be so bad. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
I moved this list of uncited general info to here instead of leaving the impression that they were used in writing the articles. Any that have actually been used should be actually cited instead:
These should be put back in .. will have to work them in individually apparently ... J. D. Redding 22:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
This article was created by one user to express his personal opinion. I suggest that it is deleted. Martin Hogbin ( talk) 22:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)