This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion / Continental / Modern Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Philosophy of religion Continental philosophy Modern philosophy

I do not really understand this concept at all from the blurb that is on the page. Can someone extrapolate a little? (Perhaps in so doing the groundwork will be laid for an expanded article) The Futurist Corporation ( talk) 04:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC) reply

This article is not at all helpful or useful. The passage quoted does not contain any reference to "radical evil" nor does it anywhere provide explanation of how Kant's discussion, quoted here, of good, the law, and the absence of violation of the law, relates to "radical evil." 68.119.43.20 ( talk) 01:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 13 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Krystianagiron. Peer reviewers: HunterKaimi, Sihern Han.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 11:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply