![]() | Radial glial cell received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 October 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
CJAmbrose,
Nicole Wolard.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"the content of glycogen granules or the expression of the astrocyte-specific glutamate transporter or the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). " These are glial properties? If so, should we find some references and then put it into the glial cell article? Keith Galveston ( talk) 02:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I have doubts whether this new material belongs in the article, mainly because I find it very difficult to tell whether the sources are reputable, or whether this is a fringe theory. Looie496 ( talk) 04:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
In article: - Radial glia only mention of The astrocytic hypothesis of aging of mammals.
Main article in en.wikipedia: - The astrocytic hypothesis of aging of mammals. It has all the reliable sources (peer-reviewed primary, secondary, and tertiary sources).
The dissertation itself seems to have been translated into English
here. This is clearly not "Dissertations: A Survey of Selected Recent Theses Relevant to Combating Aging" of Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey!!!
...or whether this is a
fringe theory. More likely than not, but only up to 2009-2010.
If that is the only English language scholarly notice taken of the theory,........Well, not only in English, write scientific articles.
I think that "Reverted edits by AM Borman" is not substantiation.
AM Borman (
talk) 14:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Almost all primary, secondary, and tertiary sources are on-line. (?)
AM Borman 16:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Radial glial cell received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 October 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
CJAmbrose,
Nicole Wolard.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"the content of glycogen granules or the expression of the astrocyte-specific glutamate transporter or the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). " These are glial properties? If so, should we find some references and then put it into the glial cell article? Keith Galveston ( talk) 02:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I have doubts whether this new material belongs in the article, mainly because I find it very difficult to tell whether the sources are reputable, or whether this is a fringe theory. Looie496 ( talk) 04:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
In article: - Radial glia only mention of The astrocytic hypothesis of aging of mammals.
Main article in en.wikipedia: - The astrocytic hypothesis of aging of mammals. It has all the reliable sources (peer-reviewed primary, secondary, and tertiary sources).
The dissertation itself seems to have been translated into English
here. This is clearly not "Dissertations: A Survey of Selected Recent Theses Relevant to Combating Aging" of Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey!!!
...or whether this is a
fringe theory. More likely than not, but only up to 2009-2010.
If that is the only English language scholarly notice taken of the theory,........Well, not only in English, write scientific articles.
I think that "Reverted edits by AM Borman" is not substantiation.
AM Borman (
talk) 14:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Almost all primary, secondary, and tertiary sources are on-line. (?)
AM Borman 16:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)