This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I think this article should be changed to "Racial classification of South Asian Americans", so the information in there doesn't have to be reproduced in the Pakistani American article. As it stands, racial classification information in the Pakistani American article is a prohibited WP:CFORK of this article.---- Dark Tea 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
User:Thoreaulylazy made some big changes to the article which removed the part about Parsis being classified as white, Roma being classified as white, poor Indians identifying as black, Indians who identify as brown not identifying with Hispanics, the US Census' definition of race using the phrase "origins in the original peoples of". I would like that user to explain her self/him self, since there was no edit summary for these edits.---- Dark Tea © 22:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Indians are not all racially the same, some are Indo-Aryan and some are Dravidian. How are they in the same group as Chinese, Koreans, and Vietnamese? 97.118.63.76 ( talk) 20:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. The article has been updated to reflect the necessary changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.16.191 ( talk) 20:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Great job man! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.16.191 ( talk) 20:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
This page is being vandalized and reverted to previous versions of the page often by a user with multiple IP addresses. For this reason, it's difficult to issue a warning to any specific IP address. Requesting semi-protection of this page.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
-- AmericanHistorian ( talk) 03:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello FACT CHECKER 10007, I have created this discussion so you can explain why you feel the content you have repeatedly removed from the article should be removed.– BrandonXLF ( talk) 00:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
This article is a low-quality mess. With the likely prominence of Nikki Haley in 2023, it should be replaced by a new, coherent article, covering both history and current facts. Note, for example, that the text containing the peculiar phrase "Working-class or state school-educated" has been pasted in twice. Similarly, the confusion between Census Bureau policy, activist assertions, and reliable opinion polls is pervasive. 76.167.85.97 ( talk) 15:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I think this article should be changed to "Racial classification of South Asian Americans", so the information in there doesn't have to be reproduced in the Pakistani American article. As it stands, racial classification information in the Pakistani American article is a prohibited WP:CFORK of this article.---- Dark Tea 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
User:Thoreaulylazy made some big changes to the article which removed the part about Parsis being classified as white, Roma being classified as white, poor Indians identifying as black, Indians who identify as brown not identifying with Hispanics, the US Census' definition of race using the phrase "origins in the original peoples of". I would like that user to explain her self/him self, since there was no edit summary for these edits.---- Dark Tea © 22:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Indians are not all racially the same, some are Indo-Aryan and some are Dravidian. How are they in the same group as Chinese, Koreans, and Vietnamese? 97.118.63.76 ( talk) 20:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. The article has been updated to reflect the necessary changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.16.191 ( talk) 20:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Great job man! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.16.191 ( talk) 20:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
This page is being vandalized and reverted to previous versions of the page often by a user with multiple IP addresses. For this reason, it's difficult to issue a warning to any specific IP address. Requesting semi-protection of this page.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
-- AmericanHistorian ( talk) 03:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello FACT CHECKER 10007, I have created this discussion so you can explain why you feel the content you have repeatedly removed from the article should be removed.– BrandonXLF ( talk) 00:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
This article is a low-quality mess. With the likely prominence of Nikki Haley in 2023, it should be replaced by a new, coherent article, covering both history and current facts. Note, for example, that the text containing the peculiar phrase "Working-class or state school-educated" has been pasted in twice. Similarly, the confusion between Census Bureau policy, activist assertions, and reliable opinion polls is pervasive. 76.167.85.97 ( talk) 15:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)