Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mark Arsten ( talk · contribs) 18:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Upon its review on November 21, 2012, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:

contains cleanup banners including, but not limited to, {{ cleanup}}, {{ expand}}, {{ wikify}}, {{ NPOV}}, {{ unreferenced}}, etc, or large numbers of {{ fact}}, {{ clarifyme}}, {{ huh}}, or similar tags

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. Mark Arsten ( talk) 18:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply