Well, first of all, since there are absolutely no real articles linking here, I will have to do research without any established context. This is bad.
First of all, this seems to be biblically related. Our first google hit [1] points us towards a page discussing Matthew 2:17,18. The title of the page is The Weeping of Rachel which is kind of strange, because it doesn't jive with Rachel Weeping. Subtitles infer that this is not actually a proper noun, which casts further doubt on this article's presence in the Open Tasks template.
Next, [2] we have a painting by the non-notable artist Stephen Gjertson (no such Wikipedia article). What is the meaning of this? I don't know. Nonetheless, it seems to not be a classical art piece (I think it's for sale), so this is ruled out too.
We have [3], which talks about the "Day of the Innocents" and the contrast between the Birth of Christ (Mary rejoices) and the death of the children (Rachel Weeping). We have a humorous [4] mirror of Wikipedia of a non-existant article. And then we have another link to the picture we saw earlier. [5]
This page will be redirected to Matthew 2, the Wikipedia article describing the events that Rachel Weeping seems to refer to. Feel free to dispute my conclusions on this talk page, but Rachel Weeping has been on here too long. — Ambush Commander( Talk) 18:26, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
Well, first of all, since there are absolutely no real articles linking here, I will have to do research without any established context. This is bad.
First of all, this seems to be biblically related. Our first google hit [1] points us towards a page discussing Matthew 2:17,18. The title of the page is The Weeping of Rachel which is kind of strange, because it doesn't jive with Rachel Weeping. Subtitles infer that this is not actually a proper noun, which casts further doubt on this article's presence in the Open Tasks template.
Next, [2] we have a painting by the non-notable artist Stephen Gjertson (no such Wikipedia article). What is the meaning of this? I don't know. Nonetheless, it seems to not be a classical art piece (I think it's for sale), so this is ruled out too.
We have [3], which talks about the "Day of the Innocents" and the contrast between the Birth of Christ (Mary rejoices) and the death of the children (Rachel Weeping). We have a humorous [4] mirror of Wikipedia of a non-existant article. And then we have another link to the picture we saw earlier. [5]
This page will be redirected to Matthew 2, the Wikipedia article describing the events that Rachel Weeping seems to refer to. Feel free to dispute my conclusions on this talk page, but Rachel Weeping has been on here too long. — Ambush Commander( Talk) 18:26, August 16, 2005 (UTC)