This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed this edit because it is unreferenced and even if it was referenced it is irrelevant in an encyclopedia article. Theroadislong ( talk) 08:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Elnaugh. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rachel Elnaugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
I just removed the following text from the article:
Elnaugh denies that she is starting a self-sustaining community, though she does acknowledge she is creating a community farm, per the Derby Telegraph article. [1] The controversy appears to be generated as much by statements vaguely attributed to local residents. Thus, I'm concerned that the text above, under a heading of "Controversy", is a breach of NPOV. — C.Fred ( talk) 21:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Info re:Cressbrook dale needs updating as it appears local authority has deemed work on land in breach of planning and have taken enforcement action. Currently states "controversial with residents", but appears works to have taken place without appropriate legal approval and then rectified. Not sure if this is worth correcting?
Source: [2]
Thanks
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed this edit because it is unreferenced and even if it was referenced it is irrelevant in an encyclopedia article. Theroadislong ( talk) 08:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Elnaugh. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rachel Elnaugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
I just removed the following text from the article:
Elnaugh denies that she is starting a self-sustaining community, though she does acknowledge she is creating a community farm, per the Derby Telegraph article. [1] The controversy appears to be generated as much by statements vaguely attributed to local residents. Thus, I'm concerned that the text above, under a heading of "Controversy", is a breach of NPOV. — C.Fred ( talk) 21:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Info re:Cressbrook dale needs updating as it appears local authority has deemed work on land in breach of planning and have taken enforcement action. Currently states "controversial with residents", but appears works to have taken place without appropriate legal approval and then rectified. Not sure if this is worth correcting?
Source: [2]
Thanks