![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although it's not needed yet, with some expansion both decisions would probably be worth individual articles. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
This article could do with additional references, but also references that expand beyond the commentary provided by Cameron. As a crown lawyer, Cameron's expertise should be (and is) recognized. But it should also recognize that an inherent bias may exist in Cameron's views against the Court's ruling, and should therefore include opposing views. I eat BC Fish ( talk) 21:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
I have recently created a page on the events in the 2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute in Nova Scotia - relating to this article. I was hoping to have some more editors familiar with the subject take a look. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 15:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although it's not needed yet, with some expansion both decisions would probably be worth individual articles. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
This article could do with additional references, but also references that expand beyond the commentary provided by Cameron. As a crown lawyer, Cameron's expertise should be (and is) recognized. But it should also recognize that an inherent bias may exist in Cameron's views against the Court's ruling, and should therefore include opposing views. I eat BC Fish ( talk) 21:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
I have recently created a page on the events in the 2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute in Nova Scotia - relating to this article. I was hoping to have some more editors familiar with the subject take a look. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 15:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)