This page was proposed for deletion by ITBF ( talk · contribs) on 9 January 2024. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the University of Calgary Law Faculty link, the proper title of this case is "R v Hughes, 2012 ABPC 250". To conform with Wikipedia custom, the title of this article should therefore be "R. v Hughes". I will move the article, leaving the previous title "Canadian Right to Food Trial" as a redirect. PK T(alk) 20:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I received the following today via Wikipedia's email service. I am pasting a copy here in case an interested editor can use something from it. I might have a go myself, depending on time opportunities:
Hi PKT,
You made a comment on this page:
R v Hughes (Canada) /info/en/?search=R_v_Hughes_(Canada)
I don't know how to edit, but I can supply info that will help improve the veracity & legitimacy of the entry.
1. Is keeping hens in the city a charter right? Other cities permit urban coops but Calgary, Toronto and Winnipeg are holding out
By Anthony A. Davis March 12, 2012
https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/running-a-fowl-of-the-constitution/
2. The Decision from the Alberta Provincial Court, 2012 ABPC 250 https://www.scribd.com/doc/105846002/R-vs-Paul-Hughes-Canadian-Right-to-Food-Trial-Decision-2012-Calgary
3. Judge rules against Calgary backyard chicken coop September 7, 2012 By The Canadian Press https://www.canadianpoultrymag.com/judge-rules-against-calgary-backyard-chicken-coop-12008/
4. Calgary chicken activist loses bylaw challenge https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-chicken-activist-loses-bylaw-challenge-1.1277278
I am the individual that appeared in court. I testify that it was me.My email is paul@xxxxx.ca. My cell is 403.xxx.xxxx.
Do you want me to do anything else? There are other news articles but it seems many are being deleted as they get older.
This page was proposed for deletion by ITBF ( talk · contribs) on 9 January 2024. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the University of Calgary Law Faculty link, the proper title of this case is "R v Hughes, 2012 ABPC 250". To conform with Wikipedia custom, the title of this article should therefore be "R. v Hughes". I will move the article, leaving the previous title "Canadian Right to Food Trial" as a redirect. PK T(alk) 20:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I received the following today via Wikipedia's email service. I am pasting a copy here in case an interested editor can use something from it. I might have a go myself, depending on time opportunities:
Hi PKT,
You made a comment on this page:
R v Hughes (Canada) /info/en/?search=R_v_Hughes_(Canada)
I don't know how to edit, but I can supply info that will help improve the veracity & legitimacy of the entry.
1. Is keeping hens in the city a charter right? Other cities permit urban coops but Calgary, Toronto and Winnipeg are holding out
By Anthony A. Davis March 12, 2012
https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/running-a-fowl-of-the-constitution/
2. The Decision from the Alberta Provincial Court, 2012 ABPC 250 https://www.scribd.com/doc/105846002/R-vs-Paul-Hughes-Canadian-Right-to-Food-Trial-Decision-2012-Calgary
3. Judge rules against Calgary backyard chicken coop September 7, 2012 By The Canadian Press https://www.canadianpoultrymag.com/judge-rules-against-calgary-backyard-chicken-coop-12008/
4. Calgary chicken activist loses bylaw challenge https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-chicken-activist-loses-bylaw-challenge-1.1277278
I am the individual that appeared in court. I testify that it was me.My email is paul@xxxxx.ca. My cell is 403.xxx.xxxx.
Do you want me to do anything else? There are other news articles but it seems many are being deleted as they get older.