A fact from R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 28 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 22:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Created by MaxnaCarta ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Looking over the article, what I think would work is the holding here that a contractor can be held liable for injuries to another contractor's employee on the same project if it is negligent. Give me a little time to think of clear wording ... Daniel Case ( talk) 06:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
A fact from R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 28 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 22:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Created by MaxnaCarta ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Looking over the article, what I think would work is the holding here that a contractor can be held liable for injuries to another contractor's employee on the same project if it is negligent. Give me a little time to think of clear wording ... Daniel Case ( talk) 06:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)