![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This article was edited to contain a partial translation of RTL Group from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Possible negative POV pushing at RTL Television and here. Haven't reverted as I don't know the subject.-- QuantumEngineer 13:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
"Europe's largest TV, radio and production company" - really? Bigger than the BBC? I'd like to see sources for that. Andrew Oakley ( talk) 15:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
I know it is hard to believe for any Brit but there are way bigger media comapnies and TV networks in Europe. RTL IS much bigger than the BBC, even the ARD network is bigger... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.79.133 ( talk) 14:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
A product line that is non notable outside of its association with the parent company. content should be merged here. WP:PRODUCT -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I object to seeing banners such as "Parts of the article is an indiscriminate contents. (September 2015)". I don't know what it's trying to say, but it's not saying it in English.
Start with "Parts of the article are" or "Part of the article is". Look up the verb 'to be' with google (not wikipedia, that's what got you into trouble in the first place). Once you've got that far, (Take your time, no rush), you would then need an adjective, such as 'red', 'slow', or indeed, "indiscriminate". There's no place here for a noun, such as 'contents'. Nor would 'batman' be useful, or 'London Bridge'.
Please could someone, who understands what the O/P meant, take it away and do something useful with it?
Same applies to the comment above. What is 'non notable'? (It appears that non notable is a Wikipedia expression. Its still lousy English. Try insignificant or maybe 'not noteworthy' instead). 82.134.197.202 ( talk) 10:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)dutchdavey
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This article was edited to contain a partial translation of RTL Group from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Possible negative POV pushing at RTL Television and here. Haven't reverted as I don't know the subject.-- QuantumEngineer 13:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
"Europe's largest TV, radio and production company" - really? Bigger than the BBC? I'd like to see sources for that. Andrew Oakley ( talk) 15:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
I know it is hard to believe for any Brit but there are way bigger media comapnies and TV networks in Europe. RTL IS much bigger than the BBC, even the ARD network is bigger... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.79.133 ( talk) 14:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
A product line that is non notable outside of its association with the parent company. content should be merged here. WP:PRODUCT -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I object to seeing banners such as "Parts of the article is an indiscriminate contents. (September 2015)". I don't know what it's trying to say, but it's not saying it in English.
Start with "Parts of the article are" or "Part of the article is". Look up the verb 'to be' with google (not wikipedia, that's what got you into trouble in the first place). Once you've got that far, (Take your time, no rush), you would then need an adjective, such as 'red', 'slow', or indeed, "indiscriminate". There's no place here for a noun, such as 'contents'. Nor would 'batman' be useful, or 'London Bridge'.
Please could someone, who understands what the O/P meant, take it away and do something useful with it?
Same applies to the comment above. What is 'non notable'? (It appears that non notable is a Wikipedia expression. Its still lousy English. Try insignificant or maybe 'not noteworthy' instead). 82.134.197.202 ( talk) 10:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)dutchdavey