This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an excellent reference for any future updates: http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/Markings/bombs/vvsord.php -- Hrimpurstala ( talk) 23:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
RS-82 (rocket family)#Operational history says:
whereas RP-3#History says:
Which article is correct? RP-3#History cites a source for the 20+ year earlier claim. -- Teratornis ( talk) 05:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Are there any sources that show what the RBS versions of these rockets were? 86.147.131.143 ( talk) 11:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on RS-82 (rocket family). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Have carried out a general cleanup of the article, including additional references, so have removed the "Additional References Requirement" template. Ilenart626 ( talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is an excellent reference for any future updates: http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/Markings/bombs/vvsord.php -- Hrimpurstala ( talk) 23:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
RS-82 (rocket family)#Operational history says:
whereas RP-3#History says:
Which article is correct? RP-3#History cites a source for the 20+ year earlier claim. -- Teratornis ( talk) 05:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Are there any sources that show what the RBS versions of these rockets were? 86.147.131.143 ( talk) 11:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on RS-82 (rocket family). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Have carried out a general cleanup of the article, including additional references, so have removed the "Additional References Requirement" template. Ilenart626 ( talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)