This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
RJ TextEd article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Author of RJ TextEd allowed me to create an article on wikipedia proof link - http://www.rjsoftware.se/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=4843&sid=8f1e1883d49e7a028715a97b96154c4f#4843
But wikipedia has a lot of articles about the text editor (PSPad, Notepad, AkelPad and others)? What is this convenient and freeware editor is worse? Is RJ TextEd not entitled to become a well-known (and therefore better because of the emergence of new users) because of Wikipedia? -- User:Se7h ( talk) 15:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I only ask: why RJ TextEd can not have articles on Wikipedia? -- Se7h ( talk) 15:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I removed the copyrighted contents -- Se7h ( talk) 19:45, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Can not show the Features of the program? --
Se7h (
talk)
12:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Article was edited and presented in the required form, please remove the tag COI -- Se7h ( talk) 11:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Most of the "references" are from download sites for the subject, and can hardly be considered WP:RS … see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ TextEd (2nd nomination) … must we have another WP:AfD? — 70.21.12.213 ( talk) 20:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains only the objective facts about the program, with proof-links. It is easy to check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.125.112.0 ( talk) 22:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains only the objective facts about the program, with proof-links. It is easy to check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Se7h ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Help me make the article better, it just so tiny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Se7h ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... The program doesn't lack notability, but the article doesn't link to enough sources. This can be addressed. Here are a few links that should satisfy the notability requirement. Maybe someone could add them to the article.
PC Advisor lists " The five best downloads for programming" which includes RJ TextEd.
PC Advisor also has a review of the program here.) -- 161.52.160.134 ( talk) 21:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
RJ TextEd article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Author of RJ TextEd allowed me to create an article on wikipedia proof link - http://www.rjsoftware.se/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=4843&sid=8f1e1883d49e7a028715a97b96154c4f#4843
But wikipedia has a lot of articles about the text editor (PSPad, Notepad, AkelPad and others)? What is this convenient and freeware editor is worse? Is RJ TextEd not entitled to become a well-known (and therefore better because of the emergence of new users) because of Wikipedia? -- User:Se7h ( talk) 15:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I only ask: why RJ TextEd can not have articles on Wikipedia? -- Se7h ( talk) 15:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I removed the copyrighted contents -- Se7h ( talk) 19:45, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Can not show the Features of the program? --
Se7h (
talk)
12:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Article was edited and presented in the required form, please remove the tag COI -- Se7h ( talk) 11:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Most of the "references" are from download sites for the subject, and can hardly be considered WP:RS … see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ TextEd (2nd nomination) … must we have another WP:AfD? — 70.21.12.213 ( talk) 20:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains only the objective facts about the program, with proof-links. It is easy to check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.125.112.0 ( talk) 22:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains only the objective facts about the program, with proof-links. It is easy to check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Se7h ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Help me make the article better, it just so tiny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Se7h ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... The program doesn't lack notability, but the article doesn't link to enough sources. This can be addressed. Here are a few links that should satisfy the notability requirement. Maybe someone could add them to the article.
PC Advisor lists " The five best downloads for programming" which includes RJ TextEd.
PC Advisor also has a review of the program here.) -- 161.52.160.134 ( talk) 21:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)