![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I think the main "thrust" of this article needs to be clarified. If we're talking about the "RCAF Overseas" the article will be broad and include content related to all RCAF operations outside of Canada, including headquarters. The article as it stands now, only refers to the headquarters, in which case the title should be moved to "RCAF Overseas Headquarters". I think the broader approach (not just about the HQ) is the way to go; an article such as this would be very valuable. Thoughts on this? BC talk to me 06:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
In addition to providing "liaison with the British Air Ministry", providing a "central location for personnel records" and providing "general administration" didn't the HQ also have some form of authority over Canadian units and formations serving with the RAF (e.g. No. 6 Group RCAF)? Any ideas how this worked? Greenshed ( talk) 01:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
A picture of the badge is at http://jfchalifoux.com/rcaf_overseas.jpg A suitably licensed version would be appreciated if anyone has the time. Greenshed ( talk) 04:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I think the main "thrust" of this article needs to be clarified. If we're talking about the "RCAF Overseas" the article will be broad and include content related to all RCAF operations outside of Canada, including headquarters. The article as it stands now, only refers to the headquarters, in which case the title should be moved to "RCAF Overseas Headquarters". I think the broader approach (not just about the HQ) is the way to go; an article such as this would be very valuable. Thoughts on this? BC talk to me 06:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
In addition to providing "liaison with the British Air Ministry", providing a "central location for personnel records" and providing "general administration" didn't the HQ also have some form of authority over Canadian units and formations serving with the RAF (e.g. No. 6 Group RCAF)? Any ideas how this worked? Greenshed ( talk) 01:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
A picture of the badge is at http://jfchalifoux.com/rcaf_overseas.jpg A suitably licensed version would be appreciated if anyone has the time. Greenshed ( talk) 04:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)