![]() | R. W. Goodman has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 28, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: No Great Shaker ( talk · contribs) 16:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker ( talk) 16:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
This ticks all the boxes above and so it passes the review. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker ( talk) 13:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | R. W. Goodman has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 28, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: No Great Shaker ( talk · contribs) 16:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker ( talk) 16:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
This ticks all the boxes above and so it passes the review. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker ( talk) 13:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)