The report generatad by the MadmanBot states that alternative names of the enzyme constitute copyright violation. The names of the enzyme are in public domain. This is a good example of how, otherwise a very useful tool, could occasionally generate misleading reports. -- Dcirovic ( talk) 18:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The report generatad by the MadmanBot states that alternative names of the enzyme constitute copyright violation. The names of the enzyme are in public domain. This is a good example of how, otherwise a very useful tool, could occasionally generate misleading reports. -- Dcirovic ( talk) 18:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)