![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That's a Quodlibet as well, isn't it?
-- 188.194.212.40 ( talk) 20:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
uh... 'libet' does not at all mean 'freely'; rather, libet = is pleasing
I'm not sure what the difference between 'Mashups' and regular quodlibets is.
Could that be a new reference? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fionnbharr ( talk • contribs)
The article says "popular through the thirteenth century (1300s)"
The thirteenth century was the 1200s. The 1300s were the fourteenth century. Who originally wrote this sentence? Which is correct? -- Grace 01:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Does PDQ Bach's parody of the 1812 Overture, where all of the melodies are replaced by similar but easily recognizable tunes (notably the nursery rhyme "Around the Mulberry Bush") count in this category? -- Anansii 02:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I came across this word in a completely different context different from the explanation pertaining to musical terminology. In the Mirriam-Webster and other dictionary I found that Quodlibet also means a subtle argument within philosophical/scholastic/theological traditions.
Doesn't this alternate meaning of the word warrants for at least a reference to this alternate explanation? -- 85.145.121.149 ( talk) 11:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
A great deal of edits are removed due to the referencing of an intentional construction (ie: Musicals). However the main page cites no necessity for lack of intent. As such, could such a requirement be added with citation, or could the removal of edits on these grounds cease. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaceCorgi94 ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That's a Quodlibet as well, isn't it?
-- 188.194.212.40 ( talk) 20:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
uh... 'libet' does not at all mean 'freely'; rather, libet = is pleasing
I'm not sure what the difference between 'Mashups' and regular quodlibets is.
Could that be a new reference? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fionnbharr ( talk • contribs)
The article says "popular through the thirteenth century (1300s)"
The thirteenth century was the 1200s. The 1300s were the fourteenth century. Who originally wrote this sentence? Which is correct? -- Grace 01:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Does PDQ Bach's parody of the 1812 Overture, where all of the melodies are replaced by similar but easily recognizable tunes (notably the nursery rhyme "Around the Mulberry Bush") count in this category? -- Anansii 02:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I came across this word in a completely different context different from the explanation pertaining to musical terminology. In the Mirriam-Webster and other dictionary I found that Quodlibet also means a subtle argument within philosophical/scholastic/theological traditions.
Doesn't this alternate meaning of the word warrants for at least a reference to this alternate explanation? -- 85.145.121.149 ( talk) 11:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
A great deal of edits are removed due to the referencing of an intentional construction (ie: Musicals). However the main page cites no necessity for lack of intent. As such, could such a requirement be added with citation, or could the removal of edits on these grounds cease. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaceCorgi94 ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)