![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 10 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Quo primum tempore. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
This article, in addition to citing no references, is written in a style that advocates a specific point of view. By making statements such as "By this, he forbade alterations by other authorities, ecclesiastical or civil, or by private individuals, but obviously not by himself or by his successors, whose authority as Popes were equal to his own," the article is endorsing a particular point of view with regards to the intent of Quo Primum. The use of words like "obviously," without citing any sources, has the authors of the article themselves taking specific positions. The article, for example, completely ignores the position taken by Traditionalist Catholics and, in fact, seems to be written with a goal of refuting them. Ithizar ( talk) 15:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 18:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Quo primum → Quo primum tempore – I suggest renaming this page into "Quo primum tempore", since that is the complete title of the apostolic constitution. Karma1998 ( talk) 22:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 10 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Quo primum tempore. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
This article, in addition to citing no references, is written in a style that advocates a specific point of view. By making statements such as "By this, he forbade alterations by other authorities, ecclesiastical or civil, or by private individuals, but obviously not by himself or by his successors, whose authority as Popes were equal to his own," the article is endorsing a particular point of view with regards to the intent of Quo Primum. The use of words like "obviously," without citing any sources, has the authors of the article themselves taking specific positions. The article, for example, completely ignores the position taken by Traditionalist Catholics and, in fact, seems to be written with a goal of refuting them. Ithizar ( talk) 15:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 18:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Quo primum → Quo primum tempore – I suggest renaming this page into "Quo primum tempore", since that is the complete title of the apostolic constitution. Karma1998 ( talk) 22:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)