This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I think I'm going to not only fix up the geobox for the Quesnel, but also fix up the text. There is a lot of good info but it is quite disorganised; tributaries, sources, you name it... needs to be organized a bit. Also, is there a way anyone could make it so there isn't a huge gap between the "history" section & the main section about the river itself. That gap makes it look really retarded.
AndrewEnns (
talk)
05:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I think I'm going to not only fix up the geobox for the Quesnel, but also fix up the text. There is a lot of good info but it is quite disorganised; tributaries, sources, you name it... needs to be organized a bit. Also, is there a way anyone could make it so there isn't a huge gap between the "history" section & the main section about the river itself. That gap makes it look really retarded.
AndrewEnns (
talk)
05:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)reply