![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a source for the removal of the disinterred statement (that only 10% of the former cemetery was disinterred)?? Citizen D 00:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Can someone please explain to me why a small, 200 odd word article that has reference to a print encyclopedia, and an official website for the subject has a banner asking for more references for validation? This textbox/banner should be removed until the article expands and more information is introduced (a lot more in my opinion) Citizen D 21:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure how to use this reference or where to put it, so il just leave it here
Chumchum14 ( talk) 12:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This article had over half a dozen references in the usual style, and two using a largely superceded style. I put the two non-standard references in the usual style. One of these references had disappeared because it wasn't being handled properly. Geo Swan ( talk) 05:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
The lead is rather biased and isn't very 'encyclopaedic' in its tone. I would fix it but no-one else seems to have pointed it out. Deonyi ( talk) 12:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a source for the removal of the disinterred statement (that only 10% of the former cemetery was disinterred)?? Citizen D 00:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Can someone please explain to me why a small, 200 odd word article that has reference to a print encyclopedia, and an official website for the subject has a banner asking for more references for validation? This textbox/banner should be removed until the article expands and more information is introduced (a lot more in my opinion) Citizen D 21:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure how to use this reference or where to put it, so il just leave it here
Chumchum14 ( talk) 12:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This article had over half a dozen references in the usual style, and two using a largely superceded style. I put the two non-standard references in the usual style. One of these references had disappeared because it wasn't being handled properly. Geo Swan ( talk) 05:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
The lead is rather biased and isn't very 'encyclopaedic' in its tone. I would fix it but no-one else seems to have pointed it out. Deonyi ( talk) 12:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)