Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Display name 99 ( talk · contribs) 21:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

I'm starting this review now. I've done a preliminary reading of about half the article. It looks very good and is something I could imagine seeing as an FAC in the future. I should be back with an update and any necessary comments within a day or two. Display name 99 ( talk) 21:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

This article is extremely well done. I confess I'm not very knowledgeable on the topic, but I can't find any issues. Therefore, I'm going to go ahead and promote it. Display name 99 ( talk) 14:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply