This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
[Untitled]
This term is often used to refer to this period, so it would be worth having at least a short article to explain that much rather than just redirecting searches.
Why does "Proto-Renaissance" redirect to "Quattrocento"?
This 1495 lady is Proto-Renaissance, but not Italian
What about the transitional phase from Northern Gothic to
Northern Renaissance? I was forced to delink the term
here but in fact I shouldn't have had to if the current definition of "Proto-Renaissance" wasn't so restrictive. --
Edelseider (
talk)
16:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I agree a short article is needed really. I think the term is used rather imprecisely, with a range of meanings. Some might say, I suspect, that
Trecento is as good a redirect, if only Italy is considered.
Johnbod (
talk)
04:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
That's very strange, a bit as if art history was still stuck in the time of Ruskin and all those great German masters like "Grünewald" had not yet been rediscovered! --
Edelseider (
talk)
16:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
It's not a case of seeing for myself, but seeing how RS in English normally use these inevitably subjective style-labels. Plenty of northern provincial painters didn't properly absorb Renaissance developments until well after 1700.
Johnbod (
talk)
16:44, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Of course, and I hope you didn't misunderstand me: I don't blame you for the views of English art history (in fact, I don't blame anybody), I am just wondering. --
Edelseider (
talk)
17:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
[Untitled]
This term is often used to refer to this period, so it would be worth having at least a short article to explain that much rather than just redirecting searches.
Why does "Proto-Renaissance" redirect to "Quattrocento"?
This 1495 lady is Proto-Renaissance, but not Italian
What about the transitional phase from Northern Gothic to
Northern Renaissance? I was forced to delink the term
here but in fact I shouldn't have had to if the current definition of "Proto-Renaissance" wasn't so restrictive. --
Edelseider (
talk)
16:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I agree a short article is needed really. I think the term is used rather imprecisely, with a range of meanings. Some might say, I suspect, that
Trecento is as good a redirect, if only Italy is considered.
Johnbod (
talk)
04:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
That's very strange, a bit as if art history was still stuck in the time of Ruskin and all those great German masters like "Grünewald" had not yet been rediscovered! --
Edelseider (
talk)
16:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
It's not a case of seeing for myself, but seeing how RS in English normally use these inevitably subjective style-labels. Plenty of northern provincial painters didn't properly absorb Renaissance developments until well after 1700.
Johnbod (
talk)
16:44, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Of course, and I hope you didn't misunderstand me: I don't blame you for the views of English art history (in fact, I don't blame anybody), I am just wondering. --
Edelseider (
talk)
17:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)reply