This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
If someone wants to include mathematical formulae please feel free, but please try to ensure that at least the initial paragraphs remain readable to those who don't read formulae. Qwfp ( talk) 17:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
It seems strange to me to start the article with overdispersion, this is just an application of the method but says nothing about the method itself. I am not sure if there is general agreement on the definition of quasi-likelihood, but I always understood it as a method based on *a likelihood function*, but the the wrong likelihood for the data at hand. Therefore, standard errors need to be corrected using the sandwich estimator. Please correct me if this is too narrow a view. 158.143.77.29 ( talk) 12:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
This is an abominably written article as it now stands. I wonder if anyone is not offended when being spoken to like this except in an abstract. Michael Hardy ( talk) 19:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
If someone wants to include mathematical formulae please feel free, but please try to ensure that at least the initial paragraphs remain readable to those who don't read formulae. Qwfp ( talk) 17:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
It seems strange to me to start the article with overdispersion, this is just an application of the method but says nothing about the method itself. I am not sure if there is general agreement on the definition of quasi-likelihood, but I always understood it as a method based on *a likelihood function*, but the the wrong likelihood for the data at hand. Therefore, standard errors need to be corrected using the sandwich estimator. Please correct me if this is too narrow a view. 158.143.77.29 ( talk) 12:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
This is an abominably written article as it now stands. I wonder if anyone is not offended when being spoken to like this except in an abstract. Michael Hardy ( talk) 19:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)