This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link to gens in the final paragraph was deleted with the edit summary "'gens' link goes to inappropriate Roman bits." Actually, it is the right link; it's just that the Catholic Encyclopedia article from which this article was derived rather pretentiously (and, no doubt, inaccurately) referred to the hierarchy of a Native American tribe using a Roman term. Ideally, of course, that whole paragraph will be rewritten by someone familiar enough with the subject to get it right. Until then, I've left the link in on the grounds that otherwise no one will know what it means. Chick Bowen 04:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
does anyone have information about Saracin in Pine Bluff Arkansas ? jrbonarmd@aol.com
quapaws are unicorns — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.34.198.132 ( talk) 22:52, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Quapaw/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
stub, so to speak; current article is a quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia entry, in bulk, and needs slicing down as well as independent writing as well as other refs etc; separate language article needed if possible -- Skookum1 (12 May 06) |
Last edited at 20:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Quapaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Quapaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
"Based on the associated funerary objects, and skeletal and dental morphology, these human remains have been identified as Native American or prehistoric red headed nephilim. Based on ceramic styles and construction, this site has been identified as a manifestation of the Menard Complex during the protohistoric period (1500–1700 CE). French historical documents from 1700 indicate that only the Quapaw tribe had villages in the area of the Kinkead-Mainard site. In 1818, the Quapaw ceded the central Arkansas River valley, including the Kinkead-Mainard site, to the United States. Based on historical information and continuity of occupation, these human remains have been affiliated with the Quapaw Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma."
- - Some of this information may be useful, but considering that the source notes that the fore-mentioned archaeological site might have been constructed by red-headed biblical giants, I find the source to be very dubious. Inclusion of this quote, which bases it’s information on numerous unnamed sources, in the article of a Native American tribe is in my opinion, impertinent. Hk5183 ( talk) 21:44, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
References
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link to gens in the final paragraph was deleted with the edit summary "'gens' link goes to inappropriate Roman bits." Actually, it is the right link; it's just that the Catholic Encyclopedia article from which this article was derived rather pretentiously (and, no doubt, inaccurately) referred to the hierarchy of a Native American tribe using a Roman term. Ideally, of course, that whole paragraph will be rewritten by someone familiar enough with the subject to get it right. Until then, I've left the link in on the grounds that otherwise no one will know what it means. Chick Bowen 04:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
does anyone have information about Saracin in Pine Bluff Arkansas ? jrbonarmd@aol.com
quapaws are unicorns — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.34.198.132 ( talk) 22:52, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Quapaw/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
stub, so to speak; current article is a quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia entry, in bulk, and needs slicing down as well as independent writing as well as other refs etc; separate language article needed if possible -- Skookum1 (12 May 06) |
Last edited at 20:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Quapaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Quapaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
"Based on the associated funerary objects, and skeletal and dental morphology, these human remains have been identified as Native American or prehistoric red headed nephilim. Based on ceramic styles and construction, this site has been identified as a manifestation of the Menard Complex during the protohistoric period (1500–1700 CE). French historical documents from 1700 indicate that only the Quapaw tribe had villages in the area of the Kinkead-Mainard site. In 1818, the Quapaw ceded the central Arkansas River valley, including the Kinkead-Mainard site, to the United States. Based on historical information and continuity of occupation, these human remains have been affiliated with the Quapaw Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma."
- - Some of this information may be useful, but considering that the source notes that the fore-mentioned archaeological site might have been constructed by red-headed biblical giants, I find the source to be very dubious. Inclusion of this quote, which bases it’s information on numerous unnamed sources, in the article of a Native American tribe is in my opinion, impertinent. Hk5183 ( talk) 21:44, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
References