 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
There seems to be no satisfactory way of doing bras and kets in wikipedia. Latex can do them but comes out large. They can also be achieved using, e.g., ⟩ for '>', but this does not print correctly when copied to microsoft Word. Ordinary < and > symbols seem the best bet. Caroline Thompson 22:34, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
This article is pointless. It consists only of elementary calculations that would be appropriate in a textbook; the conclusion of these calculations is already presented more elegantly here: Bell's_theorem#Bell_inequalities_are_violated_by_quantum_mechanical_predictions, and that's why I had replaced this page with a redirect, which some anon reverted. As I don't want to engage in a edit war, I hope somebody else will see this and take care of deleting this garbage. Mateus Araújo ( talk) 14:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
There seems to be no satisfactory way of doing bras and kets in wikipedia. Latex can do them but comes out large. They can also be achieved using, e.g., ⟩ for '>', but this does not print correctly when copied to microsoft Word. Ordinary < and > symbols seem the best bet. Caroline Thompson 22:34, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
This article is pointless. It consists only of elementary calculations that would be appropriate in a textbook; the conclusion of these calculations is already presented more elegantly here: Bell's_theorem#Bell_inequalities_are_violated_by_quantum_mechanical_predictions, and that's why I had replaced this page with a redirect, which some anon reverted. As I don't want to engage in a edit war, I hope somebody else will see this and take care of deleting this garbage. Mateus Araújo ( talk) 14:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)