![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"Quality management for IT services is a systematic way of ensuring that all the activities necessary to design, develop and implement IT services which satisfy the requirements of the organization and of Users along with client compliance activities which takes place as planned and that the activities are carried out cost effectively."
That sounds very narrow. Quality Management certainly has a much broader focus than IT services. -- Darrylv 01:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Did a major edit to cover the broad scope of quality management and improvement. Han —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanvanloon ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
It appears that Daniel Penfield does not follow Wikipedia policy in deleting content without discussion WP:Vandalism. I am restoring a link to a page provided by a user to the STARS methodology as well as various book references. STARS is a serious and valid methodology and has been published in the American Society for Quality. Deletion by Daniel Penfield appears to be based upon personal attack and doe not follow valid Wikipedia policy. -- Hanvanloon ( talk) 17:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
This page is badly disorganized. It is difficult to follow conversations. I am going to reorganize it into proper chronological order. Sbowers3 ( talk) 16:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."
The entire contents of this article may be true, but it is not easily verified. There are no footnotes at all. Please add footnotes for all new material and for old material, too. Sbowers3 ( talk) 17:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"Quality management for IT services is a systematic way of ensuring that all the activities necessary to design, develop and implement IT services which satisfy the requirements of the organization and of Users along with client compliance activities which takes place as planned and that the activities are carried out cost effectively."
That sounds very narrow. Quality Management certainly has a much broader focus than IT services. -- Darrylv 01:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Did a major edit to cover the broad scope of quality management and improvement. Han —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanvanloon ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
It appears that Daniel Penfield does not follow Wikipedia policy in deleting content without discussion WP:Vandalism. I am restoring a link to a page provided by a user to the STARS methodology as well as various book references. STARS is a serious and valid methodology and has been published in the American Society for Quality. Deletion by Daniel Penfield appears to be based upon personal attack and doe not follow valid Wikipedia policy. -- Hanvanloon ( talk) 17:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
This page is badly disorganized. It is difficult to follow conversations. I am going to reorganize it into proper chronological order. Sbowers3 ( talk) 16:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."
The entire contents of this article may be true, but it is not easily verified. There are no footnotes at all. Please add footnotes for all new material and for old material, too. Sbowers3 ( talk) 17:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)