![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Melissawwang. Peer reviewers:
Jameswang323,
Shrino,
Berkeleynicholas,
Oliviadey,
Adamng926,
Mervitan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 2 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Ryanliou,
Sid900. Peer reviewers:
Esk00,
Ethanpak,
H.Susanna,
Lucaskim7,
Candreaangulo,
Jeshgus,
Thenihalsingh,
Lindseyjli3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Quadratic voting reminds me of the Penrose method. Markus Schulze 15:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
"Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. 2017-03-01. Retrieved 2019-09-16.
Bilton, Nick (2010-07-06). "Changing Government and Tech With Geeks". Bits Blog. Retrieved 2019-09-16.
"Code for America Announces 2019 Fellowship Program". www.govtech.com. Retrieved 2019-09-16.
America, Code for. "Code for America Summit 2019". Code for America. Retrieved 2019-09-16. Lee, Sherman. "Quadratic Voting: A New Way to Govern Blockchains for Enterprises". Forbes. Retrieved 2019-10-01. Posner, Eric (2017). "Quadratic Voting and the Public Good: Introduction". Public Choice.
Melissawwang ( talk) 21:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
I am working to re-write this page to augment Melissawwang's stalwart contributions with some more references from the QV and economics literature. My first stab will be in the History section, and then I will move on to the other sections. My edits will aim to better align the QV page with current academic understanding and emerging consensus about artificial currency QV, and to dive a bit deeper on what is being done with QV. Mgibby5 ( talk) 18:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
I have done a relatively deep re-write of the history section and a reasonable re-write of the introduction. Next, I will do a re-write of the mechanism section. Mgibby5 ( talk) 00:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I will be adding and doing edits to this article. Here are some ideas I am planning on implementing:
I'm also super open to any suggestions! Ryanliou ( talk) 00:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1. https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-quadratic-voting-4f81805d5a06
2. https://economics.rice.edu/sites/g/files/bxs876/f/Weyl%20(paper)%20-%20Feb%202017.pdf
3. https://www.sss.ias.edu/files/pdfs/Rodrik/workshop%2014-15/Weyl-Quadratic_Voting.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sid900 ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I thought the introduction to quadratic voting is really well written because it explains an overview of the definition and origin. The article complies with informing the reader and complies with academic neutral language. I'd suggest including more citations, fixing grammar mistakes, add a more detailed analysis and include external links. There are missing citations and statements that weren't cited and include original work. this needs to be fixed. Candreaangulo ( talk) 03:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
I think the topic sentences give a great concise definition of what Quadratic Voting is and overall the lead gives an overview of what the rest of the article will discuss. Overall, I think the article contains a lot of information that often is un-cited, and needs to be re-organized to make the article more concise. Lastly, I agree that the wiki article is missing a section about business today such as Democracy Earth to give more context about the subject of Quadratic voting. Esk00 ( talk) 06:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
There are two different footnotes to "Quadratic voting as efficient corporate governance" (can't tell if it's the same work), and two different footnotes with the same link to "The new voting system that could save our democracies. nesta." -- AnonMoos ( talk) 00:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
There's a link to Democracy Earth but that just redirects to the Sybil attack page. I don't know what normal policies are here, but it was very confusing to me as a reader (I thought it was a broken link). Perhaps the link should be removed if there isn't at least a stub page? Phoenix00017 ( talk) 18:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Where does the formula "cost to the voter = (number of votes)2" come from? I don't have access to the paywalled WSJ source for this formula. But e.g. this Vitalik Buterin essay, when talking about the original paper by Weyl, says: "Now, you might ask, where does the quadratic come from? Well, the marginal cost of the n'th vote is $n (or $0.01 * n), but the total cost of n votes is ~~n²/2.".
So on the Wiki page, what happened to the factor 1/2? MondSemmel2 ( talk) 23:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Melissawwang. Peer reviewers:
Jameswang323,
Shrino,
Berkeleynicholas,
Oliviadey,
Adamng926,
Mervitan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 2 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Ryanliou,
Sid900. Peer reviewers:
Esk00,
Ethanpak,
H.Susanna,
Lucaskim7,
Candreaangulo,
Jeshgus,
Thenihalsingh,
Lindseyjli3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Quadratic voting reminds me of the Penrose method. Markus Schulze 15:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
"Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. 2017-03-01. Retrieved 2019-09-16.
Bilton, Nick (2010-07-06). "Changing Government and Tech With Geeks". Bits Blog. Retrieved 2019-09-16.
"Code for America Announces 2019 Fellowship Program". www.govtech.com. Retrieved 2019-09-16.
America, Code for. "Code for America Summit 2019". Code for America. Retrieved 2019-09-16. Lee, Sherman. "Quadratic Voting: A New Way to Govern Blockchains for Enterprises". Forbes. Retrieved 2019-10-01. Posner, Eric (2017). "Quadratic Voting and the Public Good: Introduction". Public Choice.
Melissawwang ( talk) 21:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
I am working to re-write this page to augment Melissawwang's stalwart contributions with some more references from the QV and economics literature. My first stab will be in the History section, and then I will move on to the other sections. My edits will aim to better align the QV page with current academic understanding and emerging consensus about artificial currency QV, and to dive a bit deeper on what is being done with QV. Mgibby5 ( talk) 18:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
I have done a relatively deep re-write of the history section and a reasonable re-write of the introduction. Next, I will do a re-write of the mechanism section. Mgibby5 ( talk) 00:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I will be adding and doing edits to this article. Here are some ideas I am planning on implementing:
I'm also super open to any suggestions! Ryanliou ( talk) 00:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1. https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-quadratic-voting-4f81805d5a06
2. https://economics.rice.edu/sites/g/files/bxs876/f/Weyl%20(paper)%20-%20Feb%202017.pdf
3. https://www.sss.ias.edu/files/pdfs/Rodrik/workshop%2014-15/Weyl-Quadratic_Voting.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sid900 ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I thought the introduction to quadratic voting is really well written because it explains an overview of the definition and origin. The article complies with informing the reader and complies with academic neutral language. I'd suggest including more citations, fixing grammar mistakes, add a more detailed analysis and include external links. There are missing citations and statements that weren't cited and include original work. this needs to be fixed. Candreaangulo ( talk) 03:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
I think the topic sentences give a great concise definition of what Quadratic Voting is and overall the lead gives an overview of what the rest of the article will discuss. Overall, I think the article contains a lot of information that often is un-cited, and needs to be re-organized to make the article more concise. Lastly, I agree that the wiki article is missing a section about business today such as Democracy Earth to give more context about the subject of Quadratic voting. Esk00 ( talk) 06:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
There are two different footnotes to "Quadratic voting as efficient corporate governance" (can't tell if it's the same work), and two different footnotes with the same link to "The new voting system that could save our democracies. nesta." -- AnonMoos ( talk) 00:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
There's a link to Democracy Earth but that just redirects to the Sybil attack page. I don't know what normal policies are here, but it was very confusing to me as a reader (I thought it was a broken link). Perhaps the link should be removed if there isn't at least a stub page? Phoenix00017 ( talk) 18:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Where does the formula "cost to the voter = (number of votes)2" come from? I don't have access to the paywalled WSJ source for this formula. But e.g. this Vitalik Buterin essay, when talking about the original paper by Weyl, says: "Now, you might ask, where does the quadratic come from? Well, the marginal cost of the n'th vote is $n (or $0.01 * n), but the total cost of n votes is ~~n²/2.".
So on the Wiki page, what happened to the factor 1/2? MondSemmel2 ( talk) 23:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)