This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Q Into the Storm article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I see nothing in naming conventions that precludes "Q: (etc)" as a title, and it appears that the article was initially created that way. Colons are problematic only in certain cases. -- 2601:444:380:8C00:8512:3992:73F9:FBE4 ( talk) 00:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Article titles cannot begin with an interwiki or interlanguage prefix, or namespace alias."Q:" is a prefix for Wikiquote. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Ktgriggs: Thank you for including an edit summary in your removal of this line. However the source cited inline does say that "What it locates in that gloom, among other things, is the apparent identity of Q himself: Ron Watkins." GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Because I'm heavily featured in this, I think I have a COI, so not making changes. However, GorillaWarfare wrote the section before the release of the article, and it's heavily based on early reviews. After the documentary got its public release, more positive ones followed. Several of the ones listed on Metacritic [1] aren't in the article. The documentary certainly didn't receive glowing reviews (and to be clear, I have no financial stake in its success or failure. I receive no royalties; didn't even get an appearance fee), but I think the article is overly harsh towards it based on its omission of CNN, Daily Beast, and Decider reviews. I can propose text if she doesn't want to write it. Psiĥedelisto ( talk • contribs) please always ping! 16:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Q Into the Storm article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I see nothing in naming conventions that precludes "Q: (etc)" as a title, and it appears that the article was initially created that way. Colons are problematic only in certain cases. -- 2601:444:380:8C00:8512:3992:73F9:FBE4 ( talk) 00:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Article titles cannot begin with an interwiki or interlanguage prefix, or namespace alias."Q:" is a prefix for Wikiquote. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Ktgriggs: Thank you for including an edit summary in your removal of this line. However the source cited inline does say that "What it locates in that gloom, among other things, is the apparent identity of Q himself: Ron Watkins." GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Because I'm heavily featured in this, I think I have a COI, so not making changes. However, GorillaWarfare wrote the section before the release of the article, and it's heavily based on early reviews. After the documentary got its public release, more positive ones followed. Several of the ones listed on Metacritic [1] aren't in the article. The documentary certainly didn't receive glowing reviews (and to be clear, I have no financial stake in its success or failure. I receive no royalties; didn't even get an appearance fee), but I think the article is overly harsh towards it based on its omission of CNN, Daily Beast, and Decider reviews. I can propose text if she doesn't want to write it. Psiĥedelisto ( talk • contribs) please always ping! 16:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)