I am currently reviewing this or am not at the computer.Almost done! However, I need a second opinion on the copyvio report. Thanks
User:David Eppstein for the info! (See below.)
Tessaract2Talk 17:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
The copyvio check failed, but's it's a reverse situation. See below.
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
Covers major aspects of the topic.
Pass
(b) (focused)
Does not go into too much detail from what I could tell.
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
Meets NPOV, and not sure how it couldn't.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
Most edits made today are by the same user.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
All images are in Creative Commons or public domain.
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
Well used and well captioned.
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Pass
After followup on a talk page comment I made (see below) I can safely say this is a pass!
Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.
So the
copyvio detector has an over 75% confidence, but it seems like coincidencebasic info that is needed anyways for most of it. I need another opinion here.
Tessaract2Talk 18:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Tessaract2: Thanks! Is there anything more you're waiting on from me before completing the review (
WP:GA/REV, Step 4)? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
David Eppstein:I'm all done. I don't know how to close it though. Do I have to do anything after marking it as passed?Never mind.
Additional notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
I am currently reviewing this or am not at the computer.Almost done! However, I need a second opinion on the copyvio report. Thanks
User:David Eppstein for the info! (See below.)
Tessaract2Talk 17:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
The copyvio check failed, but's it's a reverse situation. See below.
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
Covers major aspects of the topic.
Pass
(b) (focused)
Does not go into too much detail from what I could tell.
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
Meets NPOV, and not sure how it couldn't.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
Most edits made today are by the same user.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
All images are in Creative Commons or public domain.
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
Well used and well captioned.
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Pass
After followup on a talk page comment I made (see below) I can safely say this is a pass!
Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.
So the
copyvio detector has an over 75% confidence, but it seems like coincidencebasic info that is needed anyways for most of it. I need another opinion here.
Tessaract2Talk 18:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Tessaract2: Thanks! Is there anything more you're waiting on from me before completing the review (
WP:GA/REV, Step 4)? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
David Eppstein:I'm all done. I don't know how to close it though. Do I have to do anything after marking it as passed?Never mind.
Additional notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.