This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Empire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Numismatics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I do not agree with the transscription as "pysa". (I see the same transcription on coin catalogue http://colnect.com/en/coins/list/country/2578-Zanzibar but they obviously do not read Arabic)

1. The Indian name was paisa پیسہ‎. Written defectively (=without the short a before I) pis-h where the feminine ending "ah" usually is transcribed "a" = paisa.

2. For Arabs, who do not have "p" the transcription was and is "b" = بيسة "baisa" - cf. Omani Rial until today.

3. I see no reason why this lemma should be "pysa" and not either Zanzibari "paisa" or "baisa". -- Kipala ( talk) 19:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC) reply