(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
Ref number 6: "New Archaeological Discoveries in the Abusir Pyramid Field - by Miroslav Verner: Sahure's Causeway (2007)" is a non-english reference. If this is the only source for this information of equel validity it can be used, but requires a note to explain its use. This can be done in the inline citation itself or made as a seperate note. You do not have to provide a translation of the section used but is acceptable.
Y Actually it is an English reference ! The first paragraph is in italian but scroll down the page and the whole second part is the English version.
Ref 15 is just an image and cannot be used in this manner. It is original research.
YI only wanted to show a picture of the starving bedouins as I doubt that many readers will have the relief in mind. I am not trying to reference any claim with this picture, only show what the article talks about. I put the picture in the text and added the Miroslav Verner reference book claiming the similarity between the two reliefs, see below.
Iry-Hor (
talk)
12:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Ref 17 is just an image and cannot be used in this manner. It is original research.
YAgain only an illustration. I removed it and put it in the external links.|| Fail
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
I am seeing some issues with primary source images being used to reference claims of analysis. There may be other issues. I will note them below.
Fail
(c) (original research)
There does appear to be some original research. I will make a note of all the issues I see.
"The courtyard was paved with irregularly shaped but polished black basalt slabs, some of which are still visible today.[17]" is not supported by a reference.
That is no original research: the black basalt flooring is visible by everyone on the following pictures:
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
Appears neutral in tone and appearance.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
Stable. No edit wars or changing versions.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
I removed two images for not having information summaries with date, author and source.
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
No issues.
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Fail
Some issues to address.
I have addressed all the issues you raised !! If you fail the article, please explain why and in particular why the improvements I made following your comments do not satisfy you ? Please explain otherwise I will contest the fail.
Iry-Hor (
talk)
10:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)reply
I did all the changes you required except one which I explain is no original research ! Instead of failing straight ahead I believe we should have discussed about this one point I did not change. GA review is not an automatic process where the article must be fail as soon as at least one point made by the reviewer is contested. Thus, yes I will contest the review.
Iry-Hor (
talk)
09:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.
Additional Notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
Ref number 6: "New Archaeological Discoveries in the Abusir Pyramid Field - by Miroslav Verner: Sahure's Causeway (2007)" is a non-english reference. If this is the only source for this information of equel validity it can be used, but requires a note to explain its use. This can be done in the inline citation itself or made as a seperate note. You do not have to provide a translation of the section used but is acceptable.
Y Actually it is an English reference ! The first paragraph is in italian but scroll down the page and the whole second part is the English version.
Ref 15 is just an image and cannot be used in this manner. It is original research.
YI only wanted to show a picture of the starving bedouins as I doubt that many readers will have the relief in mind. I am not trying to reference any claim with this picture, only show what the article talks about. I put the picture in the text and added the Miroslav Verner reference book claiming the similarity between the two reliefs, see below.
Iry-Hor (
talk)
12:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Ref 17 is just an image and cannot be used in this manner. It is original research.
YAgain only an illustration. I removed it and put it in the external links.|| Fail
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
I am seeing some issues with primary source images being used to reference claims of analysis. There may be other issues. I will note them below.
Fail
(c) (original research)
There does appear to be some original research. I will make a note of all the issues I see.
"The courtyard was paved with irregularly shaped but polished black basalt slabs, some of which are still visible today.[17]" is not supported by a reference.
That is no original research: the black basalt flooring is visible by everyone on the following pictures:
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
Appears neutral in tone and appearance.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
Stable. No edit wars or changing versions.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
I removed two images for not having information summaries with date, author and source.
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
No issues.
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Fail
Some issues to address.
I have addressed all the issues you raised !! If you fail the article, please explain why and in particular why the improvements I made following your comments do not satisfy you ? Please explain otherwise I will contest the fail.
Iry-Hor (
talk)
10:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)reply
I did all the changes you required except one which I explain is no original research ! Instead of failing straight ahead I believe we should have discussed about this one point I did not change. GA review is not an automatic process where the article must be fail as soon as at least one point made by the reviewer is contested. Thus, yes I will contest the review.
Iry-Hor (
talk)
09:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.
Additional Notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.