![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the Pylons of Messina are not visible on this picture! So remove this picture, please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.8.107 ( talk • contribs) 00:37, 27 December 2004
Expand this section. Add please
Why were there switching stations at both ends of the span? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.191.252 ( talk) 20:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Please add pictures of the mentioned switching stations and the cable terminals of the 380 kV line
Is it already under construction or already built? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.157.135 ( talk) 15:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
In the Design section, it says: "They did however have the longest span of any hydroelectric crossing ever built at 3646 meters, even greater than that of the current record holder the Zhoushan Island Overhead Powerline Tie at 2,700 meters." According to the article on the Ameralik Span, that crossing, which has existed since 1993, is at 5,376 meters considerably longer than both the Messina crossing and the Zhoushan crossing mentioned. I don't know enough the facts of this matter myself, should this claim be modified in this article? OMHalck ( talk) 15:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the Pylons of Messina are not visible on this picture! So remove this picture, please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.8.107 ( talk • contribs) 00:37, 27 December 2004
Expand this section. Add please
Why were there switching stations at both ends of the span? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.191.252 ( talk) 20:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Please add pictures of the mentioned switching stations and the cable terminals of the 380 kV line
Is it already under construction or already built? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.157.135 ( talk) 15:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
In the Design section, it says: "They did however have the longest span of any hydroelectric crossing ever built at 3646 meters, even greater than that of the current record holder the Zhoushan Island Overhead Powerline Tie at 2,700 meters." According to the article on the Ameralik Span, that crossing, which has existed since 1993, is at 5,376 meters considerably longer than both the Messina crossing and the Zhoushan crossing mentioned. I don't know enough the facts of this matter myself, should this claim be modified in this article? OMHalck ( talk) 15:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)