This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://pyquante.sf.net. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2009041010003034. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
There is some text on this page that is a duplicate of the PyQuante web site. I am the author of both the web site and this page, so it is alright for the duplication.
I have added a note on the relevant site that reuse of the material is permitted under the GFDL. I have also sent email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org from the address listed on the sourceforge site that I am the owner and that I have listed the material on the web page as reusable under the GFDL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpmuller ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 April 2009
Done. The PyQuante documentation is now co-licensed under GFDL and CC-BY-SA -- Rpmuller.
Can anyone following this page let me know when I can remove the stub tags on this page? -- Rpmuller —Preceding undated comment added 14:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC).
Okay, how are we going to know if they're happy with the code if you've deleted it? I'm not trying to be contentious, I just don't know the process. I thought that the code was useful because normally it takes a huge amount of coding to write a working quantum chemistry program; this shows how you can do it using just a few lines of code. -- Rpmuller Sat Apr 11 14:30:39 UTC 2009
The XLinkBot also removed a link I added to a port of PyQuante to mobile phones, which I'm not involved in, but which I thought addressed some of the comments (i.e. adoption by larger community). I'm really trying to make this page fit with the wikipedia guide lines. Now the wikipedia page is complaining that the article reads like an advertisement. I think that the two things that were just deleted (the link to the mobile phone port and the code showing people how they can use pyquante to write their own programs) are two things that make it less of an advertisement, and they've been deleted. Rpmuller ( talk) 16:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Five years onward this page still does not cite any secondary sources. It will probably be nominated for deletion if none are added. T R 09:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://pyquante.sf.net. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2009041010003034. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
There is some text on this page that is a duplicate of the PyQuante web site. I am the author of both the web site and this page, so it is alright for the duplication.
I have added a note on the relevant site that reuse of the material is permitted under the GFDL. I have also sent email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org from the address listed on the sourceforge site that I am the owner and that I have listed the material on the web page as reusable under the GFDL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpmuller ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 April 2009
Done. The PyQuante documentation is now co-licensed under GFDL and CC-BY-SA -- Rpmuller.
Can anyone following this page let me know when I can remove the stub tags on this page? -- Rpmuller —Preceding undated comment added 14:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC).
Okay, how are we going to know if they're happy with the code if you've deleted it? I'm not trying to be contentious, I just don't know the process. I thought that the code was useful because normally it takes a huge amount of coding to write a working quantum chemistry program; this shows how you can do it using just a few lines of code. -- Rpmuller Sat Apr 11 14:30:39 UTC 2009
The XLinkBot also removed a link I added to a port of PyQuante to mobile phones, which I'm not involved in, but which I thought addressed some of the comments (i.e. adoption by larger community). I'm really trying to make this page fit with the wikipedia guide lines. Now the wikipedia page is complaining that the article reads like an advertisement. I think that the two things that were just deleted (the link to the mobile phone port and the code showing people how they can use pyquante to write their own programs) are two things that make it less of an advertisement, and they've been deleted. Rpmuller ( talk) 16:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Five years onward this page still does not cite any secondary sources. It will probably be nominated for deletion if none are added. T R 09:26, 28 April 2014 (UTC)