This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles Judaism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Uganda Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda (assessed as Low-importance).

Shouldn't this entry be named "Putto", i.e. the house style singular rather than the plural form? 213.114.187.104 07:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC) reply

• No, unlike Cupid, who is a God (but whose name is, confusinghly, also used, generally in the plural, as a synonym for putto), they generally occur in groups, so the collective notion (almost an iconographical motive) is expressed by the plural. Fastifex 09:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) reply

• yes, UNLESS perhaps if someone can show a significant difference between putti and Amoretti/ Amorini Fastifex 09:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC) reply