This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Linguistics: Applied Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force. Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There seem to be two footnote 1's, one to the national authority involved in this, one to the first of five references to HSK content.

The first footnote 1 seems to me correct in the edit page, but does not show up for me in the "Article" Page.

I'm afraid I don't know how to fix this (and I wonder whether the same numbering will show up when somebody else tries this...) Good luck and thanks.

David Lloyd-Jones ( talk) 21:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC) reply

They're more references than footnotes. Reference [1] is being used twice: as a source for how the test was developed, and as a source for the five sections of the test. In the reference list, there are links a and b to the two uses – this is neater than repeating the whole reference for the second use. Kanguole 23:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC) reply