A fact from Pushkin House appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 0 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In addition to the other tags the article at present seems to contain alot of copyright infringement from the Vanessa Bittner reference. 83.100.221.38 ( talk) 11:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
It contains information from her article, but this is not copyright infringement. 81.129.157.230 ( talk) 14:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
(Copied from my talkpage so the discussion can occur closer to the source article)
Please could you explain why you have questioned the notability of Pushkin House? This is the foremost instiute of Russian Literature in the world and an important part of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Also what exactly i youur probelm with the style, and in what way does it need changing? Harrypotter ( talk) 11:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your explanation. As the institute is also known by the name of the building, I have inserted the word eponymous. I have also put the ten departments in as structure.I do not know whether this fits your personal requirements, but I would suggest that if you have any remaining issues you attend to them yourself.Of course I don't take the addition of the tags as a personal slight - you don't even know me - but I do feel they are misplaced and could be construed as officious behaviour with all the impersonality that implies. Harrypotter ( talk) 11:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I see you have some changes which I will review presently. However you have re-introduced the notability issue. I am finding it hard to understand your problem here. Since making the remarks above, I have also added the literary reference from Alexander Blok. I put in the term eponymous, which you have removed. In fact the name has followed the institute around, and has not been restricted to a single collection of bricks and mortar. Please explain in what way you question what is the premier institute of Russian literature as being notable. I am starting to find it hard to maintain a view of your behaviour being in good faith, and would willing be exposed to any real reasons you might have for this continued behaviour, even if currently I cannot imagine what they might be. Thanks Harrypotter ( talk) 15:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
In connection with the coming 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences, which is being a particularly precious object of the cultural legacy belonging to Russian Federation nations, I decree to:
:1. Hold the celebrating festivities in the honour of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences.
:2. To the Government of Russian Federation for realization in a month’s term: collect the organization committee for preparation and conducting the celebrations of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences;
:State the programme of the preparation and conducting the celebrations of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences, including in particular its reconstruction, restoration and technical maintenance of its objects.
:3. To recommend the territorial forms of government of Russian Federation to take part in the preparation and conducting the celebrations of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences.
I would invite Editor Jasynnash2 to desist from inserting the non notable tag until a full and satisfactory response to these questions has been provided to the wikipedia community. Harrypotter ( talk) 08:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the poem text again. I think we need to be sure that this information is allowed to be republished before just inserting it (just like lyrics and such). If there is some standard permission thing on here that I'm unaware of then feel free to point me in that direction. Thanks. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 08:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
A fact from Pushkin House appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 0 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In addition to the other tags the article at present seems to contain alot of copyright infringement from the Vanessa Bittner reference. 83.100.221.38 ( talk) 11:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
It contains information from her article, but this is not copyright infringement. 81.129.157.230 ( talk) 14:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
(Copied from my talkpage so the discussion can occur closer to the source article)
Please could you explain why you have questioned the notability of Pushkin House? This is the foremost instiute of Russian Literature in the world and an important part of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Also what exactly i youur probelm with the style, and in what way does it need changing? Harrypotter ( talk) 11:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your explanation. As the institute is also known by the name of the building, I have inserted the word eponymous. I have also put the ten departments in as structure.I do not know whether this fits your personal requirements, but I would suggest that if you have any remaining issues you attend to them yourself.Of course I don't take the addition of the tags as a personal slight - you don't even know me - but I do feel they are misplaced and could be construed as officious behaviour with all the impersonality that implies. Harrypotter ( talk) 11:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I see you have some changes which I will review presently. However you have re-introduced the notability issue. I am finding it hard to understand your problem here. Since making the remarks above, I have also added the literary reference from Alexander Blok. I put in the term eponymous, which you have removed. In fact the name has followed the institute around, and has not been restricted to a single collection of bricks and mortar. Please explain in what way you question what is the premier institute of Russian literature as being notable. I am starting to find it hard to maintain a view of your behaviour being in good faith, and would willing be exposed to any real reasons you might have for this continued behaviour, even if currently I cannot imagine what they might be. Thanks Harrypotter ( talk) 15:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
In connection with the coming 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences, which is being a particularly precious object of the cultural legacy belonging to Russian Federation nations, I decree to:
:1. Hold the celebrating festivities in the honour of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences.
:2. To the Government of Russian Federation for realization in a month’s term: collect the organization committee for preparation and conducting the celebrations of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences;
:State the programme of the preparation and conducting the celebrations of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences, including in particular its reconstruction, restoration and technical maintenance of its objects.
:3. To recommend the territorial forms of government of Russian Federation to take part in the preparation and conducting the celebrations of the 100th foundation anniversary of the Russian Literature Institute (the Pushkin House), Russian Academy of Sciences.
I would invite Editor Jasynnash2 to desist from inserting the non notable tag until a full and satisfactory response to these questions has been provided to the wikipedia community. Harrypotter ( talk) 08:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the poem text again. I think we need to be sure that this information is allowed to be republished before just inserting it (just like lyrics and such). If there is some standard permission thing on here that I'm unaware of then feel free to point me in that direction. Thanks. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 08:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)