This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Somerset Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The co-ordinates for this site are incorrect - and so presumably is the GR, therefore. SP-KP ( talk) 23:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC) reply

This was an error on the SSSI data sheet transcribing to here - now fixed.— Rod ^talk 08:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi Rod. Things are still not quite right - the GR in the text, the GR in the infobox, and the co-ords at the top right give three different OS map locations ... Looking at Nature on the Map I'd say Purn Hill is at ST 332 573 SP-KP ( talk) 11:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

P.S. I discovered this glitch by browsing Google Earth ... lots of our local SSSIs (and much other stuff) are now pinpointed on there, with a link to the article here. SP-KP ( talk) 11:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I've had another go - I hadn't spotted the grid ref occurs 3 times in the stub!— Rod ^talk 11:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply