![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The true test of democracy, in the opinion of the Shiromani Akali Dal, is that the minorities should feel that they are really free and equal partners in the destiny of their country…to bring home a sense of freedom to the Sikhs, it is vital that there should be a Punjabi speaking language and culture. This will not only be in fulfillment of the pre-partition Congress program and pledges, but also in entire conformity with the universally recognized principles governing formation of provinces…The Shiromani Akali Dal has reason to believe that a Punjabi-speaking province may give the Sikhs the needful security. It believes in a Punjabi speaking province as a autonomous unit of India.”
The Akali Dal sought to create a Punjabi suba, a Punjabi-speaking state. This case was presented to the Sates Reorganization Commission established in 1953. The Akali Dal’s manifesto declared:
Deol, Harnik, Religion and Nationalism in India: The Case of the Punjab, London: Routledge, 2000, p. 93 -- Profitoftruth85 ( talk) 19:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
@ Aswin8: I'm not sure if I understand these cleanup tags here. Does this article have some bias that needs to be corrected? Jarble ( talk) 17:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
@ Jarble: Alright, I guess I was a bit too harsh on placing such tags at that time, I've removed some of the "not-so-necessary" tags. Oh and by the way, I'm not very experienced using these tags and all and wanted to give them a go, that's why. Thanks for your suggestion!
Gopalchan45678 Please explain the reason for your removal. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 14:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Public universities often have greater degrees of academic freedom, while religious institutions are required to follow their ideology more closely.SGPC is a religious institution, with a long history of embellishing their history, as per this book [2]. Their claims should not be in the infobox. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 12:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The true test of democracy, in the opinion of the Shiromani Akali Dal, is that the minorities should feel that they are really free and equal partners in the destiny of their country…to bring home a sense of freedom to the Sikhs, it is vital that there should be a Punjabi speaking language and culture. This will not only be in fulfillment of the pre-partition Congress program and pledges, but also in entire conformity with the universally recognized principles governing formation of provinces…The Shiromani Akali Dal has reason to believe that a Punjabi-speaking province may give the Sikhs the needful security. It believes in a Punjabi speaking province as a autonomous unit of India.”
The Akali Dal sought to create a Punjabi suba, a Punjabi-speaking state. This case was presented to the Sates Reorganization Commission established in 1953. The Akali Dal’s manifesto declared:
Deol, Harnik, Religion and Nationalism in India: The Case of the Punjab, London: Routledge, 2000, p. 93 -- Profitoftruth85 ( talk) 19:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
@ Aswin8: I'm not sure if I understand these cleanup tags here. Does this article have some bias that needs to be corrected? Jarble ( talk) 17:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
@ Jarble: Alright, I guess I was a bit too harsh on placing such tags at that time, I've removed some of the "not-so-necessary" tags. Oh and by the way, I'm not very experienced using these tags and all and wanted to give them a go, that's why. Thanks for your suggestion!
Gopalchan45678 Please explain the reason for your removal. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 14:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Public universities often have greater degrees of academic freedom, while religious institutions are required to follow their ideology more closely.SGPC is a religious institution, with a long history of embellishing their history, as per this book [2]. Their claims should not be in the infobox. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 12:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)