GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sagaciousphil ( talk · contribs) 10:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I made a handful of edits to this article when it was first nominated in December: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6 (very minor); and 7 (also minor). Since that time I am aware it was quick failed but that this was rescinded.
Some initial observations:
I do appreciate that this is not an easy article as, except mainly in Hungary, the recognition of the breed is still in its infancy in comparison to others. SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for responding so quickly, MapReader. I can see that you're working on the article so I'll leave it a few days and check back.
Sorry this is so piecemeal at present; I'll wait until you've had a chance to do further updates before starting a top to bottom review. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
I've done a few minor copy edits; please have a look, MapReader, to make sure I haven't done anything wrong etc. I was checking for close paraphrasing and noticed that there is a lot of similarity with this site; I strongly suspect that it has copied from WP rather than the other way round as it looks like that was last updated in 2010 and the info was in the WP article long before that. Although I can find archived copies of the website, the earliest archive copy of that page seems to be November 2010. I wonder if Nikkimaria or Justlettersandnumbers, who both have far more experience in this than I do, would have the chance and be kind enough to double check that my reasoning is correct about that as I don't know how else to ascertain it?
There is also some wording which is close to the sources: Canine Chronicle and the dogencyclopedia that needs to be addressed, please. SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
I feel it would be best if the article was thoroughly checked and could then be nominated again. I realise to fail it is disappointing, especially as the nominator has responded very quickly to points raised, but I don't feel the article is yet close enough to fulfilling the GA criteria. Other suggestions for possible inclusion could be info on hip scores for the breed in the UK and possibly incorporate the health test recommendations from the UK breed club. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sagaciousphil ( talk · contribs) 10:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I made a handful of edits to this article when it was first nominated in December: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6 (very minor); and 7 (also minor). Since that time I am aware it was quick failed but that this was rescinded.
Some initial observations:
I do appreciate that this is not an easy article as, except mainly in Hungary, the recognition of the breed is still in its infancy in comparison to others. SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for responding so quickly, MapReader. I can see that you're working on the article so I'll leave it a few days and check back.
Sorry this is so piecemeal at present; I'll wait until you've had a chance to do further updates before starting a top to bottom review. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
I've done a few minor copy edits; please have a look, MapReader, to make sure I haven't done anything wrong etc. I was checking for close paraphrasing and noticed that there is a lot of similarity with this site; I strongly suspect that it has copied from WP rather than the other way round as it looks like that was last updated in 2010 and the info was in the WP article long before that. Although I can find archived copies of the website, the earliest archive copy of that page seems to be November 2010. I wonder if Nikkimaria or Justlettersandnumbers, who both have far more experience in this than I do, would have the chance and be kind enough to double check that my reasoning is correct about that as I don't know how else to ascertain it?
There is also some wording which is close to the sources: Canine Chronicle and the dogencyclopedia that needs to be addressed, please. SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
I feel it would be best if the article was thoroughly checked and could then be nominated again. I realise to fail it is disappointing, especially as the nominator has responded very quickly to points raised, but I don't feel the article is yet close enough to fulfilling the GA criteria. Other suggestions for possible inclusion could be info on hip scores for the breed in the UK and possibly incorporate the health test recommendations from the UK breed club. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)