![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Well, it's not really correct, is it? The term 'Pug' appears to have been applied loosely to any small 0-4-0 saddle tank loco, so it doesn't count as a locomotive 'class' in the usual sense.
I would suggest Pug (steam locomotive) would be a more accurate article name.
EdJogg ( talk) 12:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
As far as I know, "Pug" is a distinctly Scottish term. I have never heard it used in England. I thought "Pug" was simply the Scots word for a tank locomotive but, at one point, the article seems to suggest that it applies to a 0-4-0T but not to a 0-6-0T. Can any Scots readers clarify the matter? Biscuittin ( talk) 15:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Well, it's not really correct, is it? The term 'Pug' appears to have been applied loosely to any small 0-4-0 saddle tank loco, so it doesn't count as a locomotive 'class' in the usual sense.
I would suggest Pug (steam locomotive) would be a more accurate article name.
EdJogg ( talk) 12:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
As far as I know, "Pug" is a distinctly Scottish term. I have never heard it used in England. I thought "Pug" was simply the Scots word for a tank locomotive but, at one point, the article seems to suggest that it applies to a 0-4-0T but not to a 0-6-0T. Can any Scots readers clarify the matter? Biscuittin ( talk) 15:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help){{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help)