This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added update and notability tags. Is anything happening with the act? Are there secondary (such as newspaper articles) sources to prove notability?
In addition the title is too long, and it's nothing that anyone will ever search on. I think a shorter name should be devised, or perhaps the content should rather be added to some existing article on trucking in the USA. -- Hordaland ( talk) 05:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Obviously, no one feels any responsibility for this article. We do have a Portal:Trucks, but except for a bot in 2013, no one has edited it since October 2012, so there's not much help to be found there.
From this article, it appears that H.R. 3095; 113th Congress probably was considered in about September 2013.
(In the middle of the section Procedural history, H.R.1961 is mentioned. Probably a typo, as H.R.1961 has to do with something else entirely. According to Google: "H.R.1961 - To amend title 46, United States Code, to extend the exemption from the fire-retardant materials construction requirement for vessels operating within ...")
H.R. 3095 is already listed in List of bills in the 113th United States Congress.
I see that the article Trucking industry in the United States has a section, Legislation, which mentions H.R. 3095. I intend to suggest merging this article into that section. -- Hordaland ( talk) 01:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
I saw this article tagged by Category:United States Government articles needing attention. Tried to make it easier to read and understand: Moved wiki links to body; Reworded bill provisions - easier for avg person to understand; Moved CBO disclaimer from the top of the section to inside the reference; Other copyedits for better readability. Hannahthom7 ( talk) 18:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added update and notability tags. Is anything happening with the act? Are there secondary (such as newspaper articles) sources to prove notability?
In addition the title is too long, and it's nothing that anyone will ever search on. I think a shorter name should be devised, or perhaps the content should rather be added to some existing article on trucking in the USA. -- Hordaland ( talk) 05:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Obviously, no one feels any responsibility for this article. We do have a Portal:Trucks, but except for a bot in 2013, no one has edited it since October 2012, so there's not much help to be found there.
From this article, it appears that H.R. 3095; 113th Congress probably was considered in about September 2013.
(In the middle of the section Procedural history, H.R.1961 is mentioned. Probably a typo, as H.R.1961 has to do with something else entirely. According to Google: "H.R.1961 - To amend title 46, United States Code, to extend the exemption from the fire-retardant materials construction requirement for vessels operating within ...")
H.R. 3095 is already listed in List of bills in the 113th United States Congress.
I see that the article Trucking industry in the United States has a section, Legislation, which mentions H.R. 3095. I intend to suggest merging this article into that section. -- Hordaland ( talk) 01:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
I saw this article tagged by Category:United States Government articles needing attention. Tried to make it easier to read and understand: Moved wiki links to body; Reworded bill provisions - easier for avg person to understand; Moved CBO disclaimer from the top of the section to inside the reference; Other copyedits for better readability. Hannahthom7 ( talk) 18:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)