This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm not sure, but I believe the term was used by the mass media. This needs verification indeed. Why do you think the tone is inappropriate for an encyclopedia?
The Ogre05:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Mostly because of this: "Eventually Playboy decided to take the high road (providing more artfull nudity) while Penthouse and Hustler (even more so) decided to provide even more explicit images." I'm new to this; maybe I was going overboard with the tags. Do you think that one should be removed?
Eloil05:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Boy, I've never seen people respond so soon to edits here before. I'll try to be a bit less liberal in my use of those tags; I'm a bit tired and perhaps getting a little trigger-happy.
Eloil05:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Removed the reference irony of the term of nude models shaving their pubic hair, as shaving of the pubic hair did not become a commonality until the 1990s.
Sadpph14:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Provenance
Where did this info come from?? I can state for a fact that Playboy did not show pubic hair (at least in the U.S editions)in 1968. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.82.132.146 (
talk)
14:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I'm not sure, but I believe the term was used by the mass media. This needs verification indeed. Why do you think the tone is inappropriate for an encyclopedia?
The Ogre05:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Mostly because of this: "Eventually Playboy decided to take the high road (providing more artfull nudity) while Penthouse and Hustler (even more so) decided to provide even more explicit images." I'm new to this; maybe I was going overboard with the tags. Do you think that one should be removed?
Eloil05:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Boy, I've never seen people respond so soon to edits here before. I'll try to be a bit less liberal in my use of those tags; I'm a bit tired and perhaps getting a little trigger-happy.
Eloil05:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Removed the reference irony of the term of nude models shaving their pubic hair, as shaving of the pubic hair did not become a commonality until the 1990s.
Sadpph14:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Provenance
Where did this info come from?? I can state for a fact that Playboy did not show pubic hair (at least in the U.S editions)in 1968. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.82.132.146 (
talk)
14:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)reply