GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk · contribs) 20:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
A primarily excellent article making use of good, scholarly sources and clearly written. Which makes certain sections that have numerous unreferenced statements and slightly less than clear wording stand out all the more. Some work is required to fulfill the GA criteria:
Comments:
The paragraphs in the lede that discuss the terms used to describe pterosaurs; does this content appear in the main body of the article? There cannot be any signficant information that appears only in the lede.
Additionally, the lede should not really contain references (since any statements must appear in the main body and would be referenced there); do the references 1-4 (and also 5-8 to an extent) appear here because the information is not present elsewhere; if not for this reason, why do they appear?
Well written:
A few problems I've found regarding clarity and wording:
Factually accurate and verifiable:
Several instances of "citation needed" already identified. Additionally:
Three references are incorrectly formatted or lack certain parameters.
Dablinks:
Pterosaur links to 1 disambiguation page (fix links).
Pterosaur links to 1 redirect which point back.
-
MasterOfHisOwnDomain (
talk)
20:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Result: Passed. - MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk) 11:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! --- Michaelzeng7 ( talk - contribs) 14:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk · contribs) 20:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
A primarily excellent article making use of good, scholarly sources and clearly written. Which makes certain sections that have numerous unreferenced statements and slightly less than clear wording stand out all the more. Some work is required to fulfill the GA criteria:
Comments:
The paragraphs in the lede that discuss the terms used to describe pterosaurs; does this content appear in the main body of the article? There cannot be any signficant information that appears only in the lede.
Additionally, the lede should not really contain references (since any statements must appear in the main body and would be referenced there); do the references 1-4 (and also 5-8 to an extent) appear here because the information is not present elsewhere; if not for this reason, why do they appear?
Well written:
A few problems I've found regarding clarity and wording:
Factually accurate and verifiable:
Several instances of "citation needed" already identified. Additionally:
Three references are incorrectly formatted or lack certain parameters.
Dablinks:
Pterosaur links to 1 disambiguation page (fix links).
Pterosaur links to 1 redirect which point back.
-
MasterOfHisOwnDomain (
talk)
20:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Result: Passed. - MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk) 11:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! --- Michaelzeng7 ( talk - contribs) 14:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)