From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron ( talk) 09:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Pteronepelys wehrii fossil
Pteronepelys wehrii fossil
  • ... that Pteronepelys (pictured) is the "winged stranger"? Archibald, S. B.; et al. (2005). "Wes Wehr dedication".
    • ALT1: ... that the single species of Pteronepelys (pictured) is named for artist Wesley Wehr? Manchester (1994) pg 107 etymology

Created/expanded by Kevmin ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC). reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough, there's no copyvio and its well sourced, qpq is done. Whilst the image is free to use, and undoubtedly really special, I don't think it will show up well on the page. I'd be inclined to perhaps add 'known as' to ALT0 - so you know it's the name? Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC) To T:DYK/P3 reply

Difficult to understand sentence

I'm having trouble understanding a sentence in the lead, and I'm wondering if there is a word missing: "It is known isolated fossil seeds found in middle Eocene sediments exposed in north central Oregon and Ypresian age fossils found in Washington, USA." Is it meant to be "It is known by..."? I am not familiar with the subject matter to confidently be certain I'm parsing the sentence correctly in the first place and determine if I'm simply overlooking something, is anyone more familiar able to clarify this? ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 01:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The missing word has already been added, it should have had a "from"-- Kev min § 14:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron ( talk) 09:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Pteronepelys wehrii fossil
Pteronepelys wehrii fossil
  • ... that Pteronepelys (pictured) is the "winged stranger"? Archibald, S. B.; et al. (2005). "Wes Wehr dedication".
    • ALT1: ... that the single species of Pteronepelys (pictured) is named for artist Wesley Wehr? Manchester (1994) pg 107 etymology

Created/expanded by Kevmin ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC). reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough, there's no copyvio and its well sourced, qpq is done. Whilst the image is free to use, and undoubtedly really special, I don't think it will show up well on the page. I'd be inclined to perhaps add 'known as' to ALT0 - so you know it's the name? Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC) To T:DYK/P3 reply

Difficult to understand sentence

I'm having trouble understanding a sentence in the lead, and I'm wondering if there is a word missing: "It is known isolated fossil seeds found in middle Eocene sediments exposed in north central Oregon and Ypresian age fossils found in Washington, USA." Is it meant to be "It is known by..."? I am not familiar with the subject matter to confidently be certain I'm parsing the sentence correctly in the first place and determine if I'm simply overlooking something, is anyone more familiar able to clarify this? ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 01:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The missing word has already been added, it should have had a "from"-- Kev min § 14:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook