![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article here on Wiki states Ptahhhotep as being Vizier around the 5th Dynasty, however the, "The Teachings of Ptahhotep" Date to written composition around the 12th Dynasty, as shown on http://www.digitalegypt.ucl.ac.uk/literature/ptahhotep.html and in the book 'History of Quotations' by M.J. Cohen & John Major; CASSELL Printing. I was just wondering which was correct and more accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HideakiGenkichi ( talk • contribs) 18:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
No, the oldest surviving Manuscript of it is Middle Kingdom, but writing style and so forth all imply it is an Old Kingdom writing in origin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.33.65 ( talk) 20:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Seconding the latter explanation. The most ancient surviving copy of this text is the Prisse Papirus I which dates to the beginning of the Middle Kingdom (XI-XII dynasty). But this doesn't mean it was written in that time. Writing style, grammar and content point to an older composition, probably in the Old Kingdom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.246.130.63 ( talk) 16:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of Gunn's 1906 translation? Jpg1954 ( talk) 20:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Who would his predecessors/parents be? 174.4.163.53 ( talk) 07:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ptahhotep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article here on Wiki states Ptahhhotep as being Vizier around the 5th Dynasty, however the, "The Teachings of Ptahhotep" Date to written composition around the 12th Dynasty, as shown on http://www.digitalegypt.ucl.ac.uk/literature/ptahhotep.html and in the book 'History of Quotations' by M.J. Cohen & John Major; CASSELL Printing. I was just wondering which was correct and more accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HideakiGenkichi ( talk • contribs) 18:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
No, the oldest surviving Manuscript of it is Middle Kingdom, but writing style and so forth all imply it is an Old Kingdom writing in origin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.33.65 ( talk) 20:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Seconding the latter explanation. The most ancient surviving copy of this text is the Prisse Papirus I which dates to the beginning of the Middle Kingdom (XI-XII dynasty). But this doesn't mean it was written in that time. Writing style, grammar and content point to an older composition, probably in the Old Kingdom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.246.130.63 ( talk) 16:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of Gunn's 1906 translation? Jpg1954 ( talk) 20:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Who would his predecessors/parents be? 174.4.163.53 ( talk) 07:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ptahhotep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)