![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please explain specifically what sentences the POV tag was added for. Mahalo! -- JereKrischel 01:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
The POV tag is justified on the basis that the article presents the Morgan Report as the definitive, authoritative, and final verdict on the role of U.S. agents in the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii. It is not such a source, and the modern mainstream historical analysis of the events presents a far more complicated picture than is represented here, doing a major disservice to readers. Cheers, Arjuna 08:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi JK, please see my comments on your talk page. Cheers. Arjuna 09:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
JK, thanks for your amusing comments. As you are smart enough to know, but failing other ammunition than to request repeated re-interation of facts already expressed and demonstrated, there is already ample sufficient and specific cause, and that the views therein are not simply "my opinion". The POV tags will stay. Aloha, Arjuna 09:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The only thing I see here that could remotely be called POV was the wording of two sentences and I fixed that. Considering that there has been no effort to correct the alleged POV in over half a year, I'm removing the POV tag. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Was the Hawaiian flag ever used for the Provisional Government? I mean days after the overthrown they raised the American flag above Iolani Palace and banned the Hawaiian flag; it was during this period that Hawaiians fashioned quilts and hatbands with the Hawaiian flag as a mean of protest. Should we change it to the American flag?-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 21:27, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please explain specifically what sentences the POV tag was added for. Mahalo! -- JereKrischel 01:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
The POV tag is justified on the basis that the article presents the Morgan Report as the definitive, authoritative, and final verdict on the role of U.S. agents in the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii. It is not such a source, and the modern mainstream historical analysis of the events presents a far more complicated picture than is represented here, doing a major disservice to readers. Cheers, Arjuna 08:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi JK, please see my comments on your talk page. Cheers. Arjuna 09:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
JK, thanks for your amusing comments. As you are smart enough to know, but failing other ammunition than to request repeated re-interation of facts already expressed and demonstrated, there is already ample sufficient and specific cause, and that the views therein are not simply "my opinion". The POV tags will stay. Aloha, Arjuna 09:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The only thing I see here that could remotely be called POV was the wording of two sentences and I fixed that. Considering that there has been no effort to correct the alleged POV in over half a year, I'm removing the POV tag. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Was the Hawaiian flag ever used for the Provisional Government? I mean days after the overthrown they raised the American flag above Iolani Palace and banned the Hawaiian flag; it was during this period that Hawaiians fashioned quilts and hatbands with the Hawaiian flag as a mean of protest. Should we change it to the American flag?-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 21:27, 30 July 2011 (UTC)