Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
This is very large, I will try to start reviewing today though. --
K. Peake 13:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good
"for Disney's animated film" → "for
Disney's animated film," with the target
Done, but linked to "Walt Disney Animation Studios" so readers know we're referring to the company's feature-length animation division.--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 01:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"The discarded song remained largely" → "After being discarded, the song remained largely"
Aladdin should be italicised since it is the film being referenced here
In this context, the sentence is actually referring discarded solos specifically for the character of Aladdin himself; I've revised the sentence for clarity.--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 05:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"during which both the mother and song were written out of the movie." → "with both the mother and song being written out of the film."
Why is the cult favourite mentioned here when the reviews like the DVD one that are listed earlier are from later time periods? Shouldn't it be earlier in the section instead???
I've moved this down to the "impact" section instead.--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 05:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Remove or replace ref 142 since PopSugar are a gossip site, not a reliable source of info
Cite Vulture instead for ref 143 with no target/wikilink
Final comments and verdict
On hold but an issue I noticed throughout was that you did overlink a lot of things. --
K. Peake 12:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
K. Peake Hi there. Firstly, I'd like to thank you for taking the time to review my article so diligently and quickly. I understand that, typically, the turnaround for responding to reviews is 7 days/a week. However, I wanted to advise you that I've run into some home computer issues that may result in my response taking a little bit longer. I hope you don't mind if I ask for another week, at the most, before passing judgement. Thanks!--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 02:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Changedforbetter No of course I don't mind; the response timeframe is what is aimed for, though it is not necessary and if you have issues then I am definitely willing to allow longer to respond. Mention me again when you have covered everything though! --
K. Peake 08:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Changedforbetter I am glad to see that you have completed the sections up to reception, how long do you think it will take you to get through the rest hopefully? --
K. Peake 12:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Changedforbetter Unfortunately I will have to ✗ Fail this, as I have allowed a good amount longer than an extra week for you to fix the issues but there are still a number of sections left to cover; I waited until now to form this verdict because today marks the end of the month. --
K. Peake 08:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)reply
K. Peake Hi there, I completely understand and wouldn't hold your decision to "fail" against you at all; you've been more than patient and accommodating. Unfortunately, my real-life career and computer various issues have gotten in the way of myself editing the article as consistently as I would have liked, for which I do apologize. Hopefully I'll be able to resubmit the article for GA once life has regulated a little. All the best! :-)--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 03:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
This is very large, I will try to start reviewing today though. --
K. Peake 13:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good
"for Disney's animated film" → "for
Disney's animated film," with the target
Done, but linked to "Walt Disney Animation Studios" so readers know we're referring to the company's feature-length animation division.--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 01:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"The discarded song remained largely" → "After being discarded, the song remained largely"
Aladdin should be italicised since it is the film being referenced here
In this context, the sentence is actually referring discarded solos specifically for the character of Aladdin himself; I've revised the sentence for clarity.--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 05:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"during which both the mother and song were written out of the movie." → "with both the mother and song being written out of the film."
Why is the cult favourite mentioned here when the reviews like the DVD one that are listed earlier are from later time periods? Shouldn't it be earlier in the section instead???
I've moved this down to the "impact" section instead.--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 05:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Remove or replace ref 142 since PopSugar are a gossip site, not a reliable source of info
Cite Vulture instead for ref 143 with no target/wikilink
Final comments and verdict
On hold but an issue I noticed throughout was that you did overlink a lot of things. --
K. Peake 12:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)reply
K. Peake Hi there. Firstly, I'd like to thank you for taking the time to review my article so diligently and quickly. I understand that, typically, the turnaround for responding to reviews is 7 days/a week. However, I wanted to advise you that I've run into some home computer issues that may result in my response taking a little bit longer. I hope you don't mind if I ask for another week, at the most, before passing judgement. Thanks!--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 02:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Changedforbetter No of course I don't mind; the response timeframe is what is aimed for, though it is not necessary and if you have issues then I am definitely willing to allow longer to respond. Mention me again when you have covered everything though! --
K. Peake 08:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Changedforbetter I am glad to see that you have completed the sections up to reception, how long do you think it will take you to get through the rest hopefully? --
K. Peake 12:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Changedforbetter Unfortunately I will have to ✗ Fail this, as I have allowed a good amount longer than an extra week for you to fix the issues but there are still a number of sections left to cover; I waited until now to form this verdict because today marks the end of the month. --
K. Peake 08:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)reply
K. Peake Hi there, I completely understand and wouldn't hold your decision to "fail" against you at all; you've been more than patient and accommodating. Unfortunately, my real-life career and computer various issues have gotten in the way of myself editing the article as consistently as I would have liked, for which I do apologize. Hopefully I'll be able to resubmit the article for GA once life has regulated a little. All the best! :-)--
Changedforbetter (
talk) 03:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply