![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Proud Prophet be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
LandonSherwood,
Josh.Brown0790,
ChisumStuckey,
Slangley111.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Lbenne,
GravityActually.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm wondering if that makes the article qualified for the single source template. I'm particularly concerned that Bracken makes a number of bold statements about the wargame's outcome but the outcomes and the timeline of the scenario listed in the report has not been declassified. I'm doubtful Bracken would still be a free man if he had used classified information to write his book which make me suspect his statements are bogus. 118.211.44.190 ( talk) 04:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Joejojie (
article contribs).
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Proud Prophet be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
LandonSherwood,
Josh.Brown0790,
ChisumStuckey,
Slangley111.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Lbenne,
GravityActually.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm wondering if that makes the article qualified for the single source template. I'm particularly concerned that Bracken makes a number of bold statements about the wargame's outcome but the outcomes and the timeline of the scenario listed in the report has not been declassified. I'm doubtful Bracken would still be a free man if he had used classified information to write his book which make me suspect his statements are bogus. 118.211.44.190 ( talk) 04:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Joejojie (
article contribs).