Protocol of Corfu has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 17, 2012, May 17, 2014, May 17, 2017, and May 17, 2021. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The way this is stated, "The Albanian Government signed on May 17" and then "The Albanian Government ratified on June 1", makes me think that the writer of this article has no good sources to back up any claims that the Government of Albania ever granted any autonomy to these "Epirotes" from Crete [1]. sulmues --Sulmues 20:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
You don't believe that albanianhistory.net is what we call wp:rs here right? This part is cited. If you don't understand German you are free to ask me, it's in page 116 -first and second paragraph-.
So, we have here a treaty signed in Corfu by a Commission (May 17). Every treaty needs then to be ratified by the involved Governments (here Albania: June 23). See also Treaty_ratification#Ratification_of_an_international_treaty. Alexikoua ( talk) 20:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- The Great Powers insisted however that autonomous Epirus should be part of the Kingdom of Albania. The Epirots nominally recognized King William as their legal sovereign and sent deputies to the Albanian Parliament, but the concessions which the Albanian government was persuaded to make granted them a completely autonomous existence. Yet the Protocol of Corfu, the product of great crisis and confusion, was not ratified by any of the parties concerned. Sir Harry Lamb, the British Ambassador of the Commission of Control, described the agreement as based on nothing real and felt that its ultimate destination was certain to be the scrap-heap.
If you read the preface this work is the definition of [ tertiary source]. Not to mention that Pearson was Zog's best friend.
The absolute majority of the source comfirm Boechk. For example: Kristo Frasheri [ [3]] who is Albanian and Stickney [ [4]].
Suppose Pearson wanted to say that it was never implemented. Alexikoua ( talk) 00:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
This one [ [5]]?
[ This] link works fine to me. What's quite weird is that [ this] although it seems to be the same it leads to nowhere. If there is still some kind of problem with the specific pdf file, the document is also available in googlebooks (I can give this link too) Alexikoua ( talk) 08:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I've repaired a specific link [ [7]] (this uni should perform a major renovation in its site). I believe everything's ok now. Quite weird, it seems that the old url had a "/" more, suppose this was the reason that it lead to something irrelevant. Anyway, now it's 100% fixed20:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
I still can't download that pdf. -- Sulmues Let's talk 21:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
This one [ [8]]? There is also this [ [9]] Alexikoua ( talk) 21:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grandiose ( talk · contribs) 12:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
First task is to source those parts marked with citation needed tags. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 12:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I feel I don't quite know enough about the subject to judge coverage on this one. What I can say is that the coverage is adequate if the Protocol is a relatively minor part of Greek/Albanian history. Is the Protocol only that? Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 14:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Coverage is much better. Some references need more details, if possible (#12, #22). I'm also struggling to understand the sentence As a consequence, Greek education was limited and for a time virtually eliminated (1934-1935).) (That ought to be a dash, not a hyphen, in any case.) One source says "Thus, all Greek schools were closed" which would seem to support your statement, but the other says "The Albanian Government, however, waived its insistence on the use of Albanian as the medium of instruction in Greek schools...". The two seem very different. How can those two things both be correct, and, if they require a certain nuance, might this be well placed in the article? Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 15:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm away for a week from tomorrow, but do work on making the prose clear:
I'll reassess then (still on hold). Thanks, Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I like to think I've addressed most of the issues you have raised. Let me know if there is still anything left to be done. Athenean ( talk) 22:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I haven't looked at the prose again too thorough (looks much better), but some references need tidying:
Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 20:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Protocol of Corfu has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 17, 2012, May 17, 2014, May 17, 2017, and May 17, 2021. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The way this is stated, "The Albanian Government signed on May 17" and then "The Albanian Government ratified on June 1", makes me think that the writer of this article has no good sources to back up any claims that the Government of Albania ever granted any autonomy to these "Epirotes" from Crete [1]. sulmues --Sulmues 20:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
You don't believe that albanianhistory.net is what we call wp:rs here right? This part is cited. If you don't understand German you are free to ask me, it's in page 116 -first and second paragraph-.
So, we have here a treaty signed in Corfu by a Commission (May 17). Every treaty needs then to be ratified by the involved Governments (here Albania: June 23). See also Treaty_ratification#Ratification_of_an_international_treaty. Alexikoua ( talk) 20:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- The Great Powers insisted however that autonomous Epirus should be part of the Kingdom of Albania. The Epirots nominally recognized King William as their legal sovereign and sent deputies to the Albanian Parliament, but the concessions which the Albanian government was persuaded to make granted them a completely autonomous existence. Yet the Protocol of Corfu, the product of great crisis and confusion, was not ratified by any of the parties concerned. Sir Harry Lamb, the British Ambassador of the Commission of Control, described the agreement as based on nothing real and felt that its ultimate destination was certain to be the scrap-heap.
If you read the preface this work is the definition of [ tertiary source]. Not to mention that Pearson was Zog's best friend.
The absolute majority of the source comfirm Boechk. For example: Kristo Frasheri [ [3]] who is Albanian and Stickney [ [4]].
Suppose Pearson wanted to say that it was never implemented. Alexikoua ( talk) 00:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
This one [ [5]]?
[ This] link works fine to me. What's quite weird is that [ this] although it seems to be the same it leads to nowhere. If there is still some kind of problem with the specific pdf file, the document is also available in googlebooks (I can give this link too) Alexikoua ( talk) 08:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I've repaired a specific link [ [7]] (this uni should perform a major renovation in its site). I believe everything's ok now. Quite weird, it seems that the old url had a "/" more, suppose this was the reason that it lead to something irrelevant. Anyway, now it's 100% fixed20:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
I still can't download that pdf. -- Sulmues Let's talk 21:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
This one [ [8]]? There is also this [ [9]] Alexikoua ( talk) 21:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grandiose ( talk · contribs) 12:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
First task is to source those parts marked with citation needed tags. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 12:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I feel I don't quite know enough about the subject to judge coverage on this one. What I can say is that the coverage is adequate if the Protocol is a relatively minor part of Greek/Albanian history. Is the Protocol only that? Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 14:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Coverage is much better. Some references need more details, if possible (#12, #22). I'm also struggling to understand the sentence As a consequence, Greek education was limited and for a time virtually eliminated (1934-1935).) (That ought to be a dash, not a hyphen, in any case.) One source says "Thus, all Greek schools were closed" which would seem to support your statement, but the other says "The Albanian Government, however, waived its insistence on the use of Albanian as the medium of instruction in Greek schools...". The two seem very different. How can those two things both be correct, and, if they require a certain nuance, might this be well placed in the article? Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 15:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm away for a week from tomorrow, but do work on making the prose clear:
I'll reassess then (still on hold). Thanks, Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I like to think I've addressed most of the issues you have raised. Let me know if there is still anything left to be done. Athenean ( talk) 22:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I haven't looked at the prose again too thorough (looks much better), but some references need tidying:
Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 20:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)