This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Alcaios:, @ Berig:, @ Ermenrich:, @ Haukurth:, @ Yngvadottir:—as you can see, the draft we were working on is now live. Please modify it here and interlink wherever possible on related articles. :bloodofox: ( talk) 05:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
In at least one instance we're listing Langobardic as an East Germanic language here (namely Gautaz). However, Langobardic is generally seen as a West Germanic language closely connected to OHG: it shows evidence of the Second sound shift, for instance. Cf. Lombardic language. Tellingly, the Langobardic form of Gautaz is Gausus, which seems to show the sound shift (cf. German beißen, Engl. bite).-- Ermenrich ( talk) 23:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Berig:, is that de Vries you added the same as "de Vries 2000"?-- Ermenrich ( talk) 14:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
The way to do this is to have the actual reprint year with year= and use orig-date= for the date of the 1st edition. That automatically fixes the linking. I'd do it myself but am a bit swamped at the moment. -- Pfold ( talk) 15:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Alcaios, The current title (“Proto-Germanic paganism”) is extremely close to the article Germanic paganism. Since this article is mostly a list wouldn’t something like “List of reconstructed concepts in Germanic paganism” be more appropriate?— Ermenrich ( talk) 20:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Alcaios:, @ Berig:, @ Ermenrich:, @ Haukurth:, @ Yngvadottir:—as you can see, the draft we were working on is now live. Please modify it here and interlink wherever possible on related articles. :bloodofox: ( talk) 05:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
In at least one instance we're listing Langobardic as an East Germanic language here (namely Gautaz). However, Langobardic is generally seen as a West Germanic language closely connected to OHG: it shows evidence of the Second sound shift, for instance. Cf. Lombardic language. Tellingly, the Langobardic form of Gautaz is Gausus, which seems to show the sound shift (cf. German beißen, Engl. bite).-- Ermenrich ( talk) 23:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Berig:, is that de Vries you added the same as "de Vries 2000"?-- Ermenrich ( talk) 14:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
The way to do this is to have the actual reprint year with year= and use orig-date= for the date of the 1st edition. That automatically fixes the linking. I'd do it myself but am a bit swamped at the moment. -- Pfold ( talk) 15:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Alcaios, The current title (“Proto-Germanic paganism”) is extremely close to the article Germanic paganism. Since this article is mostly a list wouldn’t something like “List of reconstructed concepts in Germanic paganism” be more appropriate?— Ermenrich ( talk) 20:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)